I have a network set up something like the following:

Device A <---> Router A <---> Router B <---> Device B

where Router A is a tp-link Archer AX73, and Router B is a tp-link Archer C7. Router B is flashed with OpenWRT, and Router A is using stock firmware. Router B is set up to be a wireless bridge between Router A’s network, and its own (it was set up using this guide).

What I am wondering is if Device A can find, say, Device B.local, using Avahi (assuming Device A, and Device B both have Avahi installed, and running), over this bridged network. So far, I haven’t been able to get it to work, so I’m wondering if it is possible at all. I have read that Avahi only works on a local network, but I was wondering if it could be bridged.

UPDATE (2024-01-16T01:28Z):

The issues that I mentioned in this post have since been solved. The majority of the issues stemmed from the fact that the relay software that I was using, relayd, doesn’t support ipv6. All the tests that I was conducting were defaulting to ipv6, so it was appearing like the bridge was failing unpredictably. Since that realization was made, and countermeasures were enacted, the problem was solved.

  • KalciferOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Interesting, where does the 3rd hop come from? Wouldn’t the routing table just point from one router to the other – so 2 hops?

    • eutampieri@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Traceroute from device in subnet A to device in subnet B

      • Router A
      • Router B
      • Device B

      Note that the only way to do that in only two hops is to have the same router handle both subnets, contrary to what I said earlier.

      • KalciferOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        To make sure that I understand correctly, are you describing something similar to what was described in this thread?

        • eutampieri@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hmmm it seems that router B there should be a bridge. However, how comfortable are you with routing in general?

          • KalciferOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            However, how comfortable are you with routing in general?

            Ha, depends what you mean by that. If you mean manually specifying routes in a router, I think I generally understand it, but I am not at all confident in my abilities.

            • eutampieri@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Exactly that. Router A

              ip address add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
              ip address add 10.0.0.1/30 dev eth2
              ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.0.0.2
              

              Router B

              ip address add 192.168.2.1/24 dev eth1
              ip address add 10.0.0.2/30 dev eth2
              ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.0.0.1
              

              Does this make it more clear?

              • KalciferOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Does this make it more clear?

                Yes, thank you! Usually, however, most of my issues seem to stem from knowing where configs are, what tools to use for what, or where to find things in the router user interface, etc.