Hella unlikely they were used to knit gloves

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re wrong, but here’s some cool socks that someone might have worn while making dodecahedrons: https://youtu.be/SCIV27RVA90?si=inVWHIQz5bDV9LV3

      Nålbinding is a very different technique because it is early - working with small scraps of fiber because you’re just grabbing what’s available, and it’s a technique that closes itself (unlike knitting or crochet, you don’t have to “weave in” the ends). Nålbinding also involves you working “off thumb.”

      It’s very fun to imagine that Romans had a nifty way of mass producing gloves. But it’s a massive stretch. Clothing was made at home, by the women of the home. Poor women would not have been able to afford a fancy doohickey. Wealthy women didn’t make their own clothes. Prestige clothing (eg togas) was primarily woven.

      I’ve seen lots of cool people make art with things that weren’t intended for the purpose of making art, and that’s great! Folks can write messages in the sky with airplanes - that doesn’t mean that airplanes were invented for skywriting.

      • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        dude, they’re just using their thumb instead of a spool with nails in it, or perhaps these weird objects. its the same thing.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It might be helpful to try both techniques yourself.

          You can buy a spool at Walmart for pretty cheap, they’re often available at thrift stores for less. You’ll want to look up an “i-cord” tutorial. Any old yarn will do honestly, the acrylic super savers will work.

          Nålbinding will require that you use wool. The joining process involves felting the ends together (an extra knitter might do this, but it’s not necessary - it’s okay to tie them together because you’re weaving in ends afterwards). Felting is using water and patience to shape wool. For practice, you can use a cheap plastic tapestry needle honestly - save money here because the wool is going to run you a bit more.

          I find nålbinding uncomfortable and slow, personally.

        • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Do you also think crochet and knitting are the same? This is a totally different fiber art. I both knit and crochet and would not be able to hop right into this; totally different movements and methods and ways of weaving the yarn. Just because the products are similar does not make it the same.

          I hope you’re trolling because you’re getting me good lmao

    • starman2112
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Here’s the thing. You said “nålbinding is knitting.”

      Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.

      As someone who is a scientist who studies knitting, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls nålbinding knitting. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.

      If you’re saying “knitting family” you’re referring to the hobby of weaving, which includes things from crochet to macramé to plaiting.

      So your reasoning for calling nålbinding knitting is because random people “call fabric crafting knitting?” Let’s get felting and tatting in there, then, too.

      Also, calling something knitting or weaving? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. Nålbinding is nålbinding and a member of the knitting family. But that’s not what you said. You said a nålbinding is knitting, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the knitting family knitting, which means you’d call macramé, plaiting, and other weaving methods knitting, too. Which you said you don’t.

      It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?