• Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m against capital punishment but you’re way off track here, missing the forest for the trees lol

    you act like every case could go either way at any time. There are many where their crimes are unquestionable. In that case, is nitrogen more humane than keeping them locked in a box until they die? Sucking up funds that could help actual innocent people in need? That is the point being made here

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Once again: it is cheaper to house a prisoner for life than to execute one.

      • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s only cheaper because of the enormous costs and inefficiencies baked into our justice system. The costs of executing someone come down to court costs, not the tangible resources that the prisoner takes up.

        Funny enough, a lot of these appeals and investigations only cost so much and go on for so long because of the initial poor quality of police actions.

        It’s like being released after 20 years on DNA evidence that was never checked initially, or where someone was convicted of rape but never positively identified by the accuser. A procedural fuckup costs millions blown in court, prison, and settlement costs.

    • Girru00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah… except the mistakes look like slam dunks. The very definition of a false positive.