Ubisoft Exec Says Gamers Need to Get ‘Comfortable’ Not Owning Their Games for Subscriptions to Take Off::An executive at Assassin’s Creed maker Ubisoft has said gamers will need to get “comfortable” not owning their games before video game subscriptions truly take off.

  • Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My argument against this is that at least I own a license to the game rather than just a subscription. Steam still has and updates games that were made unpurchasable a decade ago. Hell, people still play rocket league on steam.

    This is a separate argument altogether. Theres “own physically” and theres “own a license” to. If you own it physically and your physical media corrupts (which happens often to digital discs) did you own it any more than if you had it on steam? It’s also illegal to make a copy of a console disc, btw.

    What the article is talking about is not even obtaining a license for at all and games just being attached to a subscription

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yup. Physical media has its own disadvantages.

      If I scratch a disc, or my house gets robbed, burns down, etc, it’s gone forever and I need to buy a new game (or hundreds!) If I have a digital copy, I still have it.

      I actually had to contend with this when my house was robbed and I lost all my DS, GBA, Dreamcast, and N64 games.

      Plus, this idea that physical media doesn’t have DRM is a complete falsehood. Discs and cartridges come with copy protection, region-locking, forced always-online DRM, etc. If that’s not digital rights management, I don’t know what is!