The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon is an American air superiority fighter that Kyiv has begged for since the start of the full-scale invasion and is expected to finally start receiving this year. It’s a versatile workhorse of a jet that’s fought in dozens of wars and is

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    you want enemy air defense to shoot at you,

    Sure, sometimes you can localize air defense through intelligence

    the radar will almost certainly not have time to re-pack and relocate before the counter-launch hits.

    What I’m thinking of is locating the radar via its emissions.

    Given that information, if one can locate the radar accurately-enough, it may be possible to both track it and find other, nearby components of the system via mechanisms that were not available in the past. We didn’t have the sort of satellite coverage that we do today in the past. And there are weapons that can be retargeted on the fly. I don’t know what kind of impact that that has had on counter-air-defense approaches.

    I don’t know if it is viable. But it may be.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Modern IAD doctrine for contested battlespaces tends to emphasize protection of assets as a first-order concern - that is, the regional commander will probably set things up so that one early-warning asset (AWACS or ground/sea based, doesn’t really matter) acts as overwatch/a canary, which can then orchestrate activation and firing of SAM batteries. In that context, you very much want to avoid simply having the SAM battery radars (of any type) radiate, because that’s a great way to get a beam-riding HARM missile lobbed at you. SAM batteries tend to use their radars only when they’re confident they largely control the airspace, or when they know something’s incoming and have a rough direction to look towards.