Right-wing pundit Dick Morris was speaking from what appeared to be a living room as the man strolled through.

  • hannes3120@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is he outspoken anti-gay? Then it’s pretty likely to be his boyfriend with how every accusation is a confession with conservatives these days…

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He doesn’t seem to be hardcore anti-gay. I haven’t found much but did find this in an article:

      Said Morris:

      "My view on gay marriage is that if a state decides to go for gay marriage, the legislature or the voters, that’s great. That’s up to them. I’ve got no problem with it. I don’t believe that the courts should jam it down anybody’s throat.

      As for his personal view? “If people want it they should be able to do it but it’s got to be a decision of the community.”

      https://www.towleroad.com/2013/02/dickmorris/

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So close to being great, but that “decision of the community” threw it all off. Why is it up to the community to restrict individual liberty?

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          Seems in line with some of the more “grounded” conservative opinions on how the Federal government and the states should run things tbh. We may disagree with them but it’s not downright stupid or anti democratic at least…

          • admiralteal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It is, but not on its own. Only when compared to the larger canon of conservative thought in which these principles are only applied to things they have preference against.

            If a conservative doesn’t like it and the federal government is protecting it it’s a states rights issue. If a conservative does like it and the federal government isn’t protecting it it’s a constitutional issue.

            There is no well reasoned principal backing these beliefs. It’s merely a facade of justification put on top of preferences.

            • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Agreed. But hey at least it’s not a completely batshit insane opinion I guess! This is how low the bar is currently

              • admiralteal@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                For someone who ostensibly believes in small government, a marriage should be seen as a contract between consenting adults. There is absolutely no reason ANY greater organization, whether the government, the community, the church, or whatever it is, should be making decisions about who can and cannot qualify for engaging in that contract.

                This guy’s entire comment is a smokescreen hiding his actual opinion. He invokes the courts jamming it down our throats… that is their job: to limit the activities of government when government overreaches. Bans or restrictions on gay marriage ARE an overreach. A “true” advocate for small government should be happy the courts are telling the government no when it overreaches – but he isn’t happy about it. Because he’s, like most conservatives, full of shit.

                The entire thing betrays that he doesn’t actually give a shit about small government. He wants government right up in peoples’ business. He wants you to share your bedsheets with government. He’s an insane, evil fuck because anyone who thinks the government should be involved in restricting marriage at ANY level is an insane, evil fuck.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That last bit shows he’s a homophobe. He thinks it’s a privilege instead of a human right and is fine with states persecuting people.

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It does, but he’s a fucking Newsmax presenter so we’re operating with a bar so low it’s somewhere in the Earth’s mantle

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Probably the least weird part of the interview if everything else Newsmax ever did is anything to go by tbh 🤷