Looking for answers.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait. Are you telling me that the US actually has a better standard for Nutritional Facts than other first world countries?

      And somehow we’re STILL the fattest nation in the world?

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The standard US “Nutrition Facts” label is very limited and typically doesn’t include much information on micro nutrients. I don’t know how it compares to other regions, but it certainly leaves a lot to be desired.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah it would be nice to have mandatory micronutrient labeling. Some labels have them, others don’t. I think it might be up to the producer to decide which micronutrients they can list.

      • uienia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Nah, the US has “per serving” on the label instead of “per 100 gr.”. And since “per serving” is mostly an arbitrarily term (the legislation which defines it basically admits so much even), it means food producers can grossly mislead consumers about the contents of their food.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Interestingly, UK foods destined for import in the US market use the US label and do include that information. Heinz Beans have 50mb calcium, 1.5mg Iron, and 370mg potassium per 130g serving, for example.

        • _haha_oh_wow_
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Huh, well it’s definitely got some of the nutritional values added (fat, salt, carbs, protein, etc.), but vitamins appear to be absent. In the US, if they weren’t listed, I would assume they were not present but TBF, I have no idea how (if at all) labeling is regulated in the UK.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes it does, well it should anyway. it’s required by law in the US, and there’s no way in hell the US has stricter laws regarding nutrition.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          How in the world does the backwards ass United States have better nutrition laws than another first world country? a European one at that

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            More strict sanitation laws often. It doesn’t matter how non-food related the system (like the box crushing machine) if it is going in a US food plant it will follow IP69K.

            • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              So, maybe 20 years ago when I was in middle school I had a dream that I was being chased by a long, giant, weasel with hundreds of legs like a millipede. This happened at an overnight LAN party at a friend’s house. I sometimes talk in my sleep and my friends overheard me muttering about the “chainweasel” in my dreams and I never lived it down.