• funkless_eck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Im not American but thinking about getting my citizenship before 2032ish (so out of this voting cycle and maybe the next) actually, the more I hear about voting for a third party is a waste, the more tempting it is. Not saying that because I’m trying to be an edge lord, or a trump supporter, or whatever else I’m sure someone will accuse me of - but because if your policy dept is so out of ideas that all you have is “vote for us or else… …you… will have voted for someone else. And they might be bad. Neener neener” then surely anything except the Biden/Trump dichotomy has got to be worth a try?

    Then to top it all that my vote won’t make a difference, to either party, it’s just pro forma so we can flip between blue Reagan and red Reagan every 8 years like normal… like - how is that not an invitation to want to fuck the system and look at third parties?

    If there was no point in voting for a third party because the I didn’t have to hold my nose because Democrats smelled good then you’d have no argument from me.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Voting for third party presently is voting for a spearhead with no spear. There’s no mass movement for it, thus no pressure to actually stand up to the massive DNC or GOP. That’s why leftists need to touch grass and organize, so that third party can be viable.

      Getting the order wrong means more GOP fascism in office, getting the order right means an actual third party becomes viable.

    • nbafantest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Describing Biden as Pro-Regan is insane, or even just the slightly less bad version of Trump is. Biden has been amazing.

      • funkless_eck
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        it was a tongue-in-cheek jab at neo liberalism, not intended as a deep dive forensic analysis of which predecessor most closely correlates to each president.