• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I could see the trouble with a single game being that a game breaking bug discovered in November could bankrupt the company by missing Christmas release, or releasing a broken product.

    A company with a few other games in the pipeline has a chance to advertise and release one of the others, which might be missing a planned level, but not actually be broken.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What I really wish is for some way for game developers to gain a cut of the secondary market* so that they weren’t so financially dependent on a treadmill of output. Developers should have a vested interest to continue to support and work on their games for as long as there’s an active fanbase. Access to the secondary market (i.e. a cut of used game sales) would enable that while also supporting consumer ownership rights. The fact that I have hundreds of dollars (more? no idea) of illiquid assets in the form of digital-only games is an undue burden on the consumer. /rant

      *not through expensive DLCs, subscriptions, or the way Skyrim did it, preferably

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I doubt Square Enix is at risk of bankruptcy. If Larian can do it, Square Enix won’t have issues.