• Sabre363
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll stick with Japanese cars that don’t fall apart in the first pot hole

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re both terrible in terms of reliability and I wouldn’t want to daily either one, but the Ferrari will retain value.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I’m going to do with a Ferrari is worry about it getting damaged or stolen. Also a Ferrari is more likely to get pulled over and the cost for insurance will be outrageous.

    I’ll take the Range Rover.

  • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the Range is probably more practical for me with the family, plus I’m less likely to crash it.

    At the same time… turning up for work in that Ferrari would certainly get people talking; until someone keys it.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Enjoy the F-40 for a while then sell it and get a cool but practical car and save the rest of the money.

  • neidu2@feddit.nlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    RR for me. Where I live, the Ferrari would gett stuck on the first speedbump. Plus, the RR is more practical as I am a family man.

    If it was a lottery prize or something, I’d pick the Ferrari with the intent of selling it right away - I am buying a Volvo XC90 in March, and then I wouldn’t have to worry about a car loan.