• Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not a real comparison. A baby is given some sugar water and already lives in diapers. They don’t even bleed after it’s done, and you just put some jelly on the front of the diaper for the first few weeks. They experience no discernable discomfort.

    An adult male has gone through puberty and has a life that doesn’t involve sleeping through 18 hours of it and getting changed every couple of hours. The risk of infection is greater because you are an adult who doesn’t get the luxury of having every single need met 24/7 and getting to rest through your entire recovery.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly. Babies can’t consent to have their bodies altered. Unless it is medically necessary, it should not be performed.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not the criteria for making medical decisions for your child, though. You have a kid, you know this. We make decisions that might have lasting physical ramifications for them for years.

        I believe in vaccines and vaccinated my kid, but if someone felt the risks of them were too high, we don’t call it child abuse. And if someone delayed vaccinations, that’s not child abuse either.

        We can phrase things in extremes like abuse all day, but it doesn’t make it true. Injecting babies with modified hepatitis c in the first 12 hours of their life sounds like assaulting a child unless you know those words just mean they got a vaccine.

        I think the reason people don’t give a shit about online circumcision protesting is because most of them are cringe sycophants, using the worst language possible to alter someone’s opinion on the issue.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Watch a video of a circumcision and get back to me. If it’s not necessary, it shouldn’t be done. When my son was born, circumcision shouldn’t have even been an option. The “cringe sycophants” are the religious and miseducated nurses that asked me if I wanted it done.

          • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’ve seen it live. No video was needed. It’s not a decision to be made in the room, though. We were asked at the 20-week appointment by our doctor. She went through the merits and downsides. She was also younger than my wife and I, so it’s not just old-school doctors who ask or think there’s merit. She didn’t push either way, though.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              We weren’t asked until after birth. I was prepared and it had been discussed. But I’m sure many are unprepared. That’s why I’m advocating on here. Know before you go. Don’t look back in hindsight and think “oh well.”

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a totally valid comparison.

      Removing the foreskin has real ramifications for not only looks but sexual pleasure (which, by the way, was why it was popularised by puritan Christians in the US – the original point was to stop teenage boys from masturbating by making it less pleasurable).

      Cutting off the foreskin at birth takes something from a man that he can’t really restore later, whereas doing nothing gives him the bodily autonomy to make that decision later. You can always remove it if you want, but once it’s gone, you can’t just grow it back.

      A baby is at your mercy and has no choice in the matter.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, you only have a short window to make it a nothing surgery vs. a week+ recovery time.

        A baby will always be at their parents’ mercy. And if a parent feels the medical benefits outweigh the risks, they get to make that choice.

        Also, I don’t get why people keep bringing up Kellog and his ilk. It’s irrelevant. WHO and the CDC both cite benefits. That’s relevant enough for a person today without pretending the reasoning has to be based on old information.

    • Cockmaster6000
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are profoundly uninformed and clearly huffing copium to deal with the fact that you chose to mutilate your own newborn sons penis. Great work bro.

        • slackassassin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Who’s more obsessed, those who leave well enough alone or those who perform drastic, unnecessary, life-altering surgery as soon as a baby enters the world?

            • slackassassin
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Less than you have. And it takes zero action to not cut a babies dick. Whereas it takes a special kind of obsession to do so.

              • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Some people believe in doctors, the CDC, the World Health Organization, and countless other institutions, and some people don’t. You’re the latter, and the last 4 years taught me that people in your camp are wrong about too many things, but also that you need to be told you are wrong before you get emboldened by your recklessness and idiocy.

                It also showed me that you’re depraved sycophants that are almost always projecting some weird perv shit.

                • slackassassin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  There’s more to science literacy than you are capable of, apparently. Otherwise, you know that there’s a biological purpose foreskin serves and the choice to remove it is weighed against risk factors that are very low and able to be mitigated.

                  Grow up, wash your dick, and use a condom. Get a circumcision if you want when you’re an adult. It’s not that hard for the vast majority of the world and history. You aren’t “right”, you’re just an asshole. Talking about genital mutilation in terms of camps, get over yourself.

                  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I read just fine. You just can’t accept that lots of people disagree with you. The person calling a medical procedure done in a hospital mutilation is obviously lying. You lie and exaggerate because telling the truth would mean you don’t get to look down on people from the internet.

                    Our bodies having parts doesn’t make them inherently useful or purposeful or superior to life without. We still have tail bones, we grow teeth that don’t fit it our mouths, babies have razor-sharp nails that they slash their faces with, and we get auto-immune diseases. Our bodies are a minefield, constantly finding new and inspired ways to die or fail in spectacular fashion.

                    Repeated childhood infections that can be reduced to zero are hard to measure as people whose children suffer from repeated infections arr loath to self report for risk of being investigated for negligence.

                    The advice to wash your dick is a sure sign that you weren’t heavily involved in raising a child. Getting them to brush their damn teeth, wash their hands, and just generally not be gross is hard enough without necessitating a genital check as well.

                    If that can be achieved with a common and safe procedure that has extra perks and downsides that are largely assumed instead of proven, all the better.