• mishielda1234@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cum, I love how your replies are more than happy to pick apart your sources without providing any of their own. A casual scroll through the other comments will reveal that most people who weren’t circumcized at birth have issues with it or regret having to have the procedure done later in life.

    There’s a reason the procedure is so ubiquitous for so long, the science and health research is there to prove it. Same way getting vaccines is mandatory in the US for going to school. Same way abortion would be if politicians didn’t keep getting involved in legitimate medical research. These procedures have been studied and peer reviewed for decades by experts, best leave it to them. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/2012/10/greater-benefits-of-infant-circumcision

    If you want to have a real argument with myself and cum (lmao) bring your own sources and maybe other people will take you seriously.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly, you get it lol. This is a funny topic because you can simply drop a fact sheet by medical professionals that all overwhelmingly agree on this topic, and then people will lose their mind. That’s why I’m only interested in looking for scientifically backed viewpoints instead of people getting so emotional. Reality disagrees with their traditions so they really hate it.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Findings from the University of Sydney suggest that around 38% of the male population globally is circumcised.

        Circumcision is the exception. I’m sure the 60% of uncircumcised men across the world live tortured lives. Source

            • cum@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              How is listening to the CDC being misinformed lol

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                The new CDC guidelines highlight methodologically flawed studies from Africa that have no relevance to the United States. They chose to ignore studies that were conducted in the United States and show no link between circumcision and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (Thomas et al., 2004).

                Media literacy necessitates consideration of opposing viewpoints from reputable sources. Not all “experts” agree with the CDC. Source.

                • cum@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Of course they don’t. Still, the CDC is very reputable and I trust them over it. It’s also ridiculous to say the CDC is misinformation.