• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What if it was something you were hosting and someone told you what to do? Kind of three antithesis of Lemmy, really.

    • Grandwolf319
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is the barrier to entry and the size. Realistically, it is very hard to make a YouTube competitor given how high the server costs are and how sticky the platform is.

      As a platform (or a company), gets bigger and bigger, it has more influence on society and it’s private status becomes more and more detrimental to the good of humanity.

      In the example you said, what I host would not have a huge impact on society, hence I would not need to be as responsible for what I do.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the breaking point is size, then what qualifies the size? What if you hosted your stuff at a medium scale in your house as a hobby? Does this mean that an anonymous person can demand that you host certain content? At what point is your infra not yours anymore?

        • Grandwolf319
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the breaking point is size, then what qualifies the size?

          When it’s a monopoly (maybe even before that, but definitely when it’s a monopoly).

          Please see standard oil and how anti trust suites broke that up.

          • Synthead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You host stuff in your house, and create a monopoly. Does a guy in a suit show up at your door to claim it? How does running a service as a hobby compare to oil?

            • Grandwolf319
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              How can I have a monopoly by hosting something in my house? If you create a forum, you don’t have a monopoly over all forums, you have control over your own forum.

              Your confusing one product with an entire sector/industry.

              • Synthead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why can’t you have a monopoly with something you host yourself? What product am I confusing with another sector?

                • Grandwolf319
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Can you give me an example of something being a monopoly that you host yourself?

                  A monopoly is a product or service that has no or little competition and has become a household name, like YouTube.

                  • Synthead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Everything is hosted by someone’s effort and will. Where the service is hosted or how well the service operates under load is irrelevant. You could have racks of metal in a data center that you rent, host infra with SaaS providers, or have a single host at home. A person can absolutely set up whatever they want at scale, and it’s not in bad form to have someone help them and pay them for their effort.

                    In my opinion, it’s the content and practices that matter, not how well the service works. People choose to use most providers because they want to use them. As an example, there are thousands of social media sites, yet Facebook is one of the dominant platforms. Every user could never log in forever starting tomorrow, and they would dry up, but realistically, this won’t happen. Personally, I don’t mind that lots of people are on Facebook. I just don’t like their practices, which are so exploitative that they regularly break laws.

                    My point in asking all these questions is that I don’t think it matters if 5 users choose to use something you’re hosting or 5 million, or even if you make money off it. If your service is successful because it’s a good service, and you’re being ethical about it, I don’t think that someone should come take it away. I do think that you should be obeying laws and paying taxes, but that just reinforces my ethics position.

                    However, this is just my opinion, which is just as valid as yours. You made an example with YouTube; what opinions do you have about YouTube, and what actions would you take? How would you describe little to no competition, and how would you create competition? What problems do you see with a product name?