Back in 2020 he was a supposed frontrunner struggling to look like one, fresh off a sluggish performance in the 2020 Iowa caucuses. He asked New Hampshire voters to help him flip the narrative and deliver him a comeback. He snarked back at critics, belittled a younger challenger and called one woman “a lying, dog-faced pony soldier” at a campaign event.

Then he skipped his own campaign party, headed to South Carolina, and finished a distant fifth in New Hampshire’s primary, faring worse than the former mayor of a midsized Midwestern city.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    So…

    Because Biden (who got whooped in NH last time) and the DNC decided NH can’t be first…

    And when NH disagreed, Biden and his campaign threw a tantrum and said they’re not even running in the primary?

    That sounds like some shit trump would do…

    Is that the behavior you want from a president?

    Or do you want something like:

    Ultimately it’s you’re choice, and I respect the primary process and will fill out the very simple forms so NH Dems get their political process.

    He’s fucking stripping NH Dems from any say in the election because the state party wouldn’t kiss his ring and you act like it’s totally cool. Because come general, we literally have no other option but D.

    Just like he went around Congress to “sell” weapons to Israel.

    Just like any example of the last 40 years of happiness m insulting voters and reporters that dare question him.

    I get he’s literally our only option, but at least be honest about who he is or it’s only going to keep getting worse.

    They’re actively throwing out primaries, because it doesn’t matter if Biden loses.

    Why aren’t you pissed?

    • CaptDust
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Looking at the facts, 1) the incumbent is always going to sweep the primaries, period. 2) the parties do not even need to hold primaries, it’s a party function not a fed requirement. 3) We’ve already learned the DNC will operate the party however they see fit during Bernie and Clinton. Saying I’m “totally cool” is an exaggeration but I really don’t understand why the state wouldn’t simply move their date if they wanted the primary.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        the parties do not even need to hold primaries, it’s a party function not a fed requirement.

        That’s the problem…

        Saying I’m “totally cool” is an exaggeration but I really don’t understand why the state wouldn’t simply move their date if they wanted the primary.

        Because the states are in charge of when and how they determine delegates…

        The state (whose decision it is) decided one thing.

        Biden and the DNC (who have zero authority) wanted something else. When they didn’t get what they wanted, they took the entire states delegates away.

        They’re punishing every registered Dem voter in NH and it will effect general turnout

        I don’t know what you don’t understand, but I don’t think I’ll ever be able to explain anything to you, so I’m going to save us both the hassle in the future.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The DNC is not a federal agency, it is private. A State may make their own decisions in comparison to private entities. If they wish to keep their primaries where they are and the DNC wants to have South Carolina first, what do you think is going to happen? They have authority over their own organization. If a State wants to go ahead with its own desires they do not get to force the DNC to bow to them just like they couldn’t force the RNC. I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how these entities interact and who holds what authority.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Me:

            Explain a problem and why the system should change

            Moderates who don’t think it’s a problem:

            But it’s leeeeegal!

            The issue is that it’s a private entity that can do whatever they want and if people don’t do what they say, then a Republican wins.

            What is complicated about that?

            Why defend something that is obviously undemocratic just because that’s currently the way it is?

            • CaptDust
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Go start your own party, with blackjack and hookers. Then you can decide who should run in the general for your party, by whatever means you see fit.

              And I mean this sincerely. We desperately need more parties.