• Blaze@discuss.onlineOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Definitely, but I feel like the second had a much lesser impact than the first

      • snugglesthefalse
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It was weird how some of the sequences just looked like game renders. Especially when they’re in the forest.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is because the tech is no longer revolutionary. Everything used and displayed on the first Avatar was a first time or completely new and bespoke piece of tech that had some visual impact apparent for the audience. Everything on the second one is been done on better films before or if it’s brand new equipment or technique, is something that is not discernible by the audience through the screen. Also, nothing of importance or substance regarding the plot happens in any of the 3 hours of script. Perhaps the most boring film I watched in 2023.