• Habahnow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Neither, but if I had to choose, maybe backwards in time. Assuming I can’t accidentally kill myself, I would be sad to not have my friends and family as well as missing technology, but I think I could make life work out.

    Going to the future seems like an extremely high risk. Uncertainty of whether the my country exists, the world, and what I can do to survive. I’d be extremely behind in tech which sucks bad.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      What? I’d say it’s pretty safe to assume the USA will be around in 50 years.

      remembers that a large portion of Lemmy users aren’t actually from America

      Oh. Right. There is a great deal of turmoil and war in the world. I guess some nations actually are at risk of collapsing.

      …soooo, like which country we talking? Canada? I could see Canada collapsing. Mostly as they fight among themselves about what to do about the great problem of keeping violent gun waving American lunatics out! I mean c’mon Toronto! Detroit is RIGHT THERE, and you don’t have a contingency plan??? Canada should build a wall.

      /s

  • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good one! I would really like to see 50 into the future, but I bet the past would be safer (unsure of that).

    I suppose I’ll take the future just for the adventure.

  • Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Depends on in what way? Going back means I can change history, be rich, … Going forward only means I get to see a future while still young.

    If I can’t change the past, then obviously going back is going to be a pile of crap with everything bad repeating.