The White House statement comes after a week of frantic negotiations in the Senate.

President Joe Biden on Friday urged Congress to pass a bipartisan bill to address the immigration crisis at the nation’s southern border, saying he would shut down the border the day the bill became law.

“What’s been negotiated would — if passed into law — be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country,” Biden said in a statement. “It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law.”

Biden’s Friday evening statement resembles a ramping up in rhetoric for the administration, placing the president philosophically in the camp arguing that the border may hit a point where closure is needed. The White House’s decision to have Biden weigh in also speaks to the delicate nature of the dealmaking, and the urgency facing his administration to take action on the border — particularly during an election year, when Republicans have used the issue to rally their base.

The president is also daring Republicans to reject the deal as it faces a make-or-break moment amid GOP fissures.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The election year eternal immigrant caravan strikes again. I get the move politically, but it’s unfortunate the GOP is so much better at messaging and controlling public focus than the Dems. They have no answer but to play the game on Republican terms.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t understand how the immigrant caravan magically disappears the Wednesday after election day. It’s like they start making their way to the border the January of an election year and then poof they are gone after the polls close.

      • CodeName@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        10 months ago

        Their greatest magic trick is that it will disappear for the entirety of a Republican administration. It’s Schrodinger’s caravan. It only exists if there is an election coming up, or a Democrat is in office.

      • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        it’s the same reason why the fears of rainbow fentanyl ramps up all october and dissappears on november 1, never to be invoked again until the next september.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a quantum thing. Schrodinger’s caravan. It both exists and doesn’t exist. When election results are observed, spooky action at a distance causes the caravan to disappear.

      • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, they’re coming here to cast illegal votes for Crooked Joe Biden /s

        It’s all so sad yet they hammer it so hard that even my Trump hating friends believe this caravan bullshit.

    • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s because the GOP take the easy road of appealing to people’s fear where as dems in theory try to appeal to logic and sensibility, it’s a fight they can never win.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s also a situation requiring nuance and informed critical thinking. We need immigrants to sustain our labor force, and we should be selective about removing red tape and monolithic obstacles for all people crossing the border while maintaining a reliable record of resources and threats to prevent the intake system from being overwhelmed. You can’t fit that on a bumper sticker.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Playing the game on Republican terms is why they seem so much better at messaging than us. “Our opponents are right that this is a problem, but our solution is better” is not convincing. “Our opponents are lying about this, like they do with everything else. The situation is under control and we’re going to keep it that way by [insert legislation du jour]” is.

      • IdiosyncraticIdiot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The situation is not under control, which is why it is gaining bipartisan support. Lying and saying they are lying just makes you the baddie… Like what?

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Big part of it is because Republican rhetoric is so much more shocking and sensationalist by design. It attracts attention instantly. Dems do the boring, bread-and-butter politics that we need to run the country. Doesn’t attract as much attention.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not that Republicans want to actually solve the issue because much like abortion it’s better to always be a looming scare tactic to use politically, but I kind of appreciate this move because the border is literally the only thing Republicans remotely have going into this election… And frankly, that isn’t much. This border crisis thing has gone on for years and no matter how much they try to use it against Dems, it ultimately doesn’t particularly impact voting outcomes all that much.

      • They can’t talk about the economy.
      • They can’t talk about covid.
      • They can’t talk about Law & Order without being reminded of Trump’s 91 criminal charges.

      … Border is all that is resonating a little with (frankly ignorant) voters.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah I was going to clarify… That completely backfired.

          Like most issues: if we let Republicans completely have what they want, it is overwhelmingly unpopular. If we let Democrats have what they want, it is overwhelmingly popular, generally.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            So why is the Biden administration doing what Republicans want here? Their name and our party’s name is going to be all over the overwhelmingly unpopular policies and Republicans are just going to keep saying the border’s a problem no matter what we do

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Because no matter how one slices it, the “border issue” is the only thing that is resonating with voters.

              The partisan split on the issue is broad, with 81 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of independents and 45 percent of Democrats saying conditions are worsening — 34 percent of Democrats said conditions are staying the same, while 21 percent said they’re improving.

              It has overtaken Inflation as the #1 issue.

              Because Democrats can’t actually do what needs to be done to solve the root problems of the border issue, the only option is to absorb the position of Republicans to take the wind out of their sails, and hopefully, be more responsible and discretionary in the process itself. Yeah Republicans will refuse to give Biden that victory, but Biden can still rebuttal in ads and on debate stages, “Oh yeah? I agreed to doing everything and more than what Republicans want and you’re still obstructing me!” (so in reality, like you said: nothing will change anyway because Republicans won’t actually endorse this and lose their last political bruiser, so what’s to lose?)

              • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                A link for that quote would be appreciated.

                Because Democrats can’t actually do what needs to be done to solve the root problems of the border issue

                They could be doing more to improve things and stop crap like this that makes it worse

                absorb the position of Republicans to take the wind out of their sails

                I have no earthly idea how you could think this will do that, it’s going to do the exact opposite by making all the people who aren’t really paying attention say “Gosh, I guess the Republicans must be right about this if the Democrats are trying to to pass their type of policies. I guess if we need a Republican approach to solve this totally real issue we should probably get it from a Republican government.”

                Biden can still rebuttal in ads and on debate stages, "Oh yeah? I agreed to doing everything and more than what Republicans want

                Republicans: “Biden’s lying or has Alzheimer’s, we wanted [xyz crap they make up on the spot] and Biden never offered it.”

                Journalists: “Our fact checkers sai-”

                Republicans: “Fake news”

                Voters: “I like their confidence! And besides, when I think ‘tough’ on the border or crime or whatever, I know that isn’t Democrats, that’s the Republican’s thing! Maybe a Democrat will talk tough when they want to get reelected but they won’t ever really do it, and there is absolutely nothing that can happen to change my mind about this because I don’t pay attention to anything because the news depresses me.”

                so what’s to lose?)

                If this legislation does pass people will suffer and die

                e; trying to be less of a sarcastic asshole

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Sure.

                  They could be doing more to improve things and stop crap like this that makes it worse

                  This is conveniently ambiguous. What, specifically?

                  I have no earthly idea how you could think this will do that, it’s going to do the exact opposite by making all the people who aren’t really paying attention say “Gosh, I guess the Republicans must be right about this if the Democrats are trying to to pass their type of policies. I guess if we need a Republican approach to solve this totally real issue we should probably get it from a Republican government.”

                  Why would you think that and not, “Gosh, I think Democrats are actually doing a pretty good job and I really don’t want to vote for Trump, and since they seem to be trying to solve the border issue as well which was my chief concern, I really don’t have a reason to not vote for them now.”?

                  You have to remember that the independents / moderates / centrists in this country are pretty easily-swayed. They go with the currents. They get fixated on the national talking-points that tend to be governed by the onslaught of right-wing media propaganda that dominates the airwaves and social media.

                  If people are saying: “I like Democrats, but I am concerned about the border,” – what option do Democrats have BUT to at least LOOK like they’re cracking down on this issue (even if they know deep-down the premise is bullshit)?

                  • So you’re Biden.
                  • You can’t actually change the current events in any meaningful way with a split Congress and Republican border states unwilling to work with you.
                  • Yet you’re still being blamed publicly for not “handling” the border.
                  • Public polling is showing your team that this is the ONLY thing that is really sticking with swing voters.
                  • You know it’s all bullshit, but you can’t publicly state this because right-wing media propaganda is controlling the narrative.
                  • You know if you lose, someone proven far, far worse will get in and be orders-of-magnitude worse for such immigrants.
                  • So what do you do…?
                  • You Call the Bluff of Republicans. You say, “Okay let’s do it. But give me control to do it.”
                  • Republicans obviously won’t because they don’t actually want to do this; they just want to use it as a political tool to hammer Democrats with.
                  • Nothing changes, but now you can at least have a rebuttal come election season.

                  What is wrong with this, and what alternative do you offer, substantively, concretely?

                  If this legislation does pass people will suffer and die

                  It won’t. Trump already undermined it. And if it does, Democrats win the election and can reverse it instead of it just passing a year down the road and being in place for much, much longer with even more people dying.

                  Edit: Sorry I forgot to respond to this:

                  Voters: “I like their confidence! And besides, when I think ‘tough’ on the border or crime or whatever, I know that isn’t Democrats, that’s the Republican’s thing! Maybe a Democrat will talk tough when they want to get reelected but they won’t ever really do it, and there is absolutely nothing that can happen to change my mind about this because I don’t pay attention to anything because the news depresses me.”

                  Fairly, I do agree there are voters out there like this. The question is how many versus how many who go, “Well, at least I see Democrats are trying, and what difference is it when Trump said he’d build the wall but didn’t… So I think I’ll just go with the stable choice since the border was my #1 issue and that was my last concern for voting for Biden. Trump is otherwise just too risky…”

                  And I mean not to sound like a broken record, but what is the alternative plan – just ignore the fact that a majority of independents view this as a major concern and the border issue (again, manufactured as it is) is now the #1 issue with voters overall? Is that really a winning strategy?

                  Regardless, you and I aren’t privy to the massive amount of polling and focus groups these campaigns with millions of dollars have. Clearly, they have data that probably fills in the gaps that you and I can only otherwise speculate over.

                  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Thank you for the link!

                    I don’t have time to respond to all of this, but there are a few things I just gotta

                    This is conveniently ambiguous. What, specifically?

                    Ask all your federal agencies what resources they have on hand that could be redirected to humanitarian efforts for migrants and asylum seekers, order those resources deployed immediately with an executive order. When federal courts strike it down for a bullshit reason, change one or two superficial details, reissue the order, and again make it effective immediately. Trump did this with his travel bans and showed a determined executive can move a lot faster than oversight.

                    Exploiting a badly designed system is not an ideal long term solution I’ll admit, but so long as the Republican party continues to exist and make solving those system design problems impossible it will have to do.

                    Also, ditch the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court with like thirteen new appointments, right after slapping yourself in the face several times for not doing this years ago.

                    Why would you think that and not, “Gosh, I think Democrats are actually doing a pretty good job and I really don’t want to vote for Trump, and since they seem to be trying to solve the border issue as well which was my chief concern, I really don’t have a reason to not vote for them now.”?

                    “The border is in crisis right now, but I think Democrats are doing a good job,” just seems like a really unlikely pair of opinions to hold to me.

                    I also feel like if you’re in a headspace where the border is your chief concern (with things like climate change, mass shootings, healthcare, affordable housing, Russia, Israel, China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. all at different levels of crisis), you’re going to be a harder sell on the big tent party.

                    And just in general, one of the axioms about human behavior I believe is that if you do not like what is being said you need to change the conversation. I’m thinking of those easily swayed moderates when I say our approach should be, “The border? Sure, we want to get funding from Congress to provide needed services there and that’s in process, but what’s driving this migration is climate change, and that’s why this administration has etc.”

                    You know it’s all bullshit, but you can’t publicly state this because right-wing media propaganda is controlling the narrative.

                    Because you do not state this right wing media propaganda controls the narrative, imo

                    but what is the alternative plan – just ignore the fact that a majority of independents view this as a major concern and the border issue (again, manufactured as it is) is now the #1 issue with voters overall? Is that really a winning strategy?

                    If it’s done with a bit of tact and coordination, yeah. Try not to seem like you’re ignoring it by responding to it quickly, but if you’re giving it more than one or two sentences you’re wasting time that should be spent talking about more important issues.