• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t understand owning a computer that you don’t fully control but using prosthetics that can be remotely disabled? This is why we need true open source GPL brain implants.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          This isn’t a prosthetic that was remotely disabled, this is failing hardware that doesn’t have support from the original company which is in the process of going bankrupt.

          I get where you’re coming from, and agree. Prosthesis and health devices should absolutely not be remotely controllable by a company. But you can’t really help a company shutting down.

          And I highly doubt there are any open source implants which help sure blindness that are ready for prime time.

          • learningduck@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            But still, if the technology is open, then someone may design some compatible replacement hardware. Imagine some makers community rig a replacement for the blind without carrying about profitability.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s one aspect, absolutely.

              The other side of that coin though, is if you really want random people tinkering with things directly attached to your body, without having a proper way to test beforehand?

              These types of devices need to go through testing before they reach human trials for a reason. While I’m happy to trust security of data and even control of my while home to FOSS communities, I honestly don’t know that I’d trust anonymous individuals online with no skin in the game with my literal body.

              • learningduck@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, that’s a legitimate concern, but letting this technology die along with a dying company is a waste. Imagine it getting brought by some patent trolls who wouldn’t do anything with it.

        • where_am_i
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m daily driving Linux. And, frankly, for my eye implant, I’ll probably buy from apple.

          I mean, no, I will buy something else, jailbreak foss it, will have to patch it while being blind from an update, and proudly tell everyone no friggin government will be able to backdoor my eye. But oh boy I’ll wish I bought one from apple, cuz those guys never go blind from updates.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, like this is technology I’ve wanted since I was a kid, the stuff I wish people were talking about when they say VR, instead of screens you wear on your head and motion-detection controllers. Video games are a lot better when they are dynamic and current VR tech can’t really do that yet.

      But that said, I’ll die never experiencing that before trusting anything Elon Musk is involved with.

    • Willie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What happens if your brain implant is like a phone, and stops getting updates after 2 or so years? That’d suck really bad.