• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Except Suicide Squad wasn’t released in that way. Maybe you’re not aware of the recent trend by AAA studios to make playing a game a week or so early one of the pre-order bonuses. People are just confusing things by using the already established “early access” label.

    I interpreted it as: people had a chance to play it before release, and realized it sucked, and then told other people online that it sucks, who then changed their minds about buying it.

    There is a difference between: an indie game being sold as Early Access on Steam, a situation where the buyer is completely aware of the state of the game, and might even be interested in participating in how that game develops going forwards; and a shitty incomplete AAA game that’s being sold as a complete experience for $60-70. I don’t think I should have to explain why they’re different.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m aware of the difference, and it’s not a new thing. I remember preordering physical console games for the OG Xbox and getting it a couple days early. The same exists for Magic: the Gathering sets.

      That style is usually called “pre-release,” which differs from “early access,” which is Steam’s term for communicating that something is unfinished yet available for purchase. Baldur’s Gate 3 followed the “early access” model where the first act was available three years before full release. Starfield followed the “pre-release” model (though called “early access”) where the full game was available about 4 days early if you paid a bit extra, but the game didn’t differ from what was available on the regular release date (except whatever bug fixes were made in those 4 days).

      I understand not wanting to pay extra for a “pre-release,” but I don’t understand writing a game off entirely just because it offers that option. However, I do understand writing a game off if it’s in “early access” because many games never actually release and the game is just a buggy mess. If there’s an official release date, I’ll usually wait a week or so to get reviews from regular people. If it’s in “early access,” I’m not going to expect an official release anytime soon and will usually just wishlist and check back later (unless the game like really good, reviews are good, and I’m okay with the game changing significantly; e.g. Palworld).

      So that’s why I think they meant Steam’s “early access” (no set release date) since the AAA “pre-release” is just a money grab that you can avoid by waiting a week and says nothing about the quality of the game (it’ll be just as buggy on the official launch date).

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        But this game was not released as Early Access. So…

        Also, BG3 was not early access, it was beta. Similar, but they’re not the same thing.

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes, Suicide Squad is “pre-release,” like Starfield was. And BG3 was early access on October 6, 2020.

          My point is that I think OP is likely complaining about “early access” in general and probably never bothered to check if Suicide Squad is “early access” (as in, beta) or “pre-release” (money grab for getting it a few days before everyone else). As in, the typical “didn’t read the article” that’s so common here and on Reddit.

          Edit: OP responded and clarified. They meant the Steam “early access” that many indie games do, not the “pre-order” that Starfield and Suicide Squad did. OP doesn’t seem to actually know anything about the game and is just responding to headlines like so many other Lemmy and Reddit users do.