Plug in or gas up, it doesn’t matter. The more you drive the more you pay.

  • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The commission’s study found that 54%, roughly half of respondents had security concerns. Roughly 88% of participating drivers opted to self-report mileage instead of using a GPS monitoring system.”

    I feel like this part of the article needed some serious exploration that isn’t there. Is there a chance in this proposition that they would track mileage with a GPS system? Because that is a much bigger deal if so.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d find it to be an invasion of privacy to have my mileage tracked, but on the other hand, people will underreport their miles if it’s up to self-reporting. The only way to do this properly is to not have self-reporting.

      • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could have the odometer read yearly by a certified person. In UT they do this for registration renewals and you can have it done at pretty much any gas station or dealership.

        I think that would be infinitely better than affixing an electronic tracking device from the government to all private vehicles.

  • ramble81@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That makes sense to some degree, given that the taxes were meant for maintenance of roads. However the per mile tax should also be a sliding value based on vehicle weight as that increases damage to the road. So a light car going a few miles wouldn’t be taxed as heavily as a truck going a long distance since it wouldn’t damage the roads the same way. Though at the point you’ve thrown out any incentive for more fuel efficient ICE powerplants.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      farmers and others also may drive quite a lot in vehicles on their own properties without ever touching a road. If it’s purely for roads and not, say, including a carbon tax or something, that seems rather unfair.

      • ramble81@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Existing gas taxes also affect them in this way then. They pay for the gas tax used and they’re not driving on public roads, so that seems to be a wash.

        • jocose@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We actually have off-road diesel for this. Alberta also used to have “purple gas” but it was halted in 1999 due to rampant abuse. We could do something like that, but it hasn’t worked historically.

  • StringTheory@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    First everyone bitches about how EVs don’t pay gas taxes to help cover road costs (which are mostly covered by other taxes anyway). Then they bitch when a more equitable tax option is suggested.

    Just can’t win, eh?