Republicans, rightwing figures and foreign politicians have seized upon the video despite proof the lawmaker was misquoted

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            interference in Israel’s ability to secure itself

            So we shouldn’t interfere then, and let them buy their own weapons with their own money?

            • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              We continued to fund UNRWA right up until we found out they were literally terrorists. I have no problem continuing to fund Israel with my tax dollars because they are most certainly not.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                nice whataboutism, still didn’t answer the question though

                because they are most certainly not

                lol, lmao even

              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Wasn’t it about 0.04% of UNRWA who were accused of being involved in the terror attack? Even if the accusations turn out to be true*, your claim that “UNRWA are literally terrorists” is about as accurate as saying that all Israelis are terrorists. Because some Israelis most certainly are.

                I’m not trying to convince you, because you clearly haven’t used rational thinking to arrive at your perspective. But you could at least try to make your argument a little bit more credible.

                *They’re not true. According to Channel 4, the intelligence report “contains no evidence to support Israel’s claim.”

                • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Huh. Crazy that the US would defend UNRWA without evidence. So either the entire US government is wrong, or you’re spreading misinformation.

                  Would love to see credible source backing up your outlandish claims.

                  • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Ok yeah, source for the number of people in UNRWA is UNRWA. Source for the number of people accused is Israel. Source for the Channel 4 findings is…Channel 4. Was there any fact in particular you don’t want to be true take issue with?
                    The US government didn’t say that all of UNRWA are terrorists. Only you did that.