Seine-Port is introducing restrictions on phone use in streets, shops and parks – but young people say there’s little else to do

A picture of a smartphone with a red line through it serves as a warning in the window of a hairdresser’s shop in a French village that has voted to ban people scrolling on their phones in public. “Everyone is struggling with too much screen time,” said Ludivine, a cardiology nurse, as she had her hair cut into a bob, leaving her phone out of sight in her bag. “I voted in favour, this could be a solution.”

Seine-Port, in the Seine-et-Marne area south of Paris, with a population of fewer than 2,000 people, last weekend voted yes in a referendum to restrict smartphone use in public, banning adults and children from scrolling on their devices while walking down the street, while sitting with others on a park bench, while in shops, cafes or eating in restaurants and while parents wait for their children in front of the school gates. Those who might check their phone’s map when lost are instead being encouraged to ask for directions.

The village has also approved a charter for families on children’s use of screens: no screens of any kind in the morning, no screens in bedrooms, no screens before bed or during meals. If parents of teenagers sign a written agreement not to give their child a smartphone before the age of 15, the town hall will provide the child with an old-fashioned handset for calls only.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sure, and if there were an unenforceable 'no walking down the sidewalk while reading a newspaper ordinance," I’d be just as unconcerned about this.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      But it’s not, “No walking while reading.” It is, “No reading in public.”

      From the summary at the top of this post:

      “while sitting with others on a park bench, while in shops, cafes or eating in restaurants and while parents wait for their children in front of the school gates. Those who might check their phone’s map when lost are instead being encouraged to ask for directions.”

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was only addressing your claim that phones present a new danger that makes sense to regulate. Then you claimed the law was only about reading and walking.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I was responding to this:

            Noise actually materially affects other people.

            Having a smart phone doesn’t.

            Having a smartphone can affect other people. And I don’t care about unenforceable ordinances.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I didn’t quote your noise argument because I agree.

              I quoted and responded to this:

              “I’ve seen people looking down at their smartphones and crossing the street almost get run over.”