Hi all, as a child I spent a lot of time working in the Processing language. Does this have any transferrable use cases / what’s the point it even exists?

  • Roldyclark@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I started with Processing and am now a senior software dev. It’s an awesome tool for visual programming which is valuable in its own right, but the coding skills will be transferable to more “practical” languages/frameworks.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    At some point, my company wanted to have some interactive, uh, graphics elements for a big conference. So, where there’d be a touchscreen and if you dragged your finger across, some color wave would follow, or something like that.

    I still think, Processing is an excellent tool for that, although admittedly the demand for that kind of thing is low.

    The skills are also quite transferrable to gamedev, although definitely far from everything you need to know.

    And as the others said, it can also teach you the basics, and in particular the fun, of programming.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I heard Cary Huang made some pretty interesting stuff with Processing, such as Evolv.io (I can’t explain it well enough, so look it up, also the link will lead you to nothing), a tool that lets you mix the faces of multiple celebrities together, as well as a program that generates an entire city landscape from one image (an example of which was used in his Battle for Dream Island cartoon series).

    However, all of which were made with an outdated version of Processing (1.x I believe) meaning they need that outdated version in order to run.

  • SethranKada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I went straight from Processing to Rust. You’d be surprised by just how many skills transfer over! I’ve found that it’s actually easier than other programming languages, aside from doing anything visual. I haven’t figured out how to do the same kind of graphics stuff as i could in processing just yet.

    As for use cases? Processing is a learning tool, and it’s great for teaching as well. You can make some pretty great animations using it, and a lot of YouTubers use it internally to animate their math videos.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think, at this point, your best bet is to use a game engine, like for example Bevy: https://bevyengine.org/examples/

      It’s not as hyper-focused on drawing things as Processing is, so there’s a bit more boilerplate to set everything up, but once you have that down, the actual drawing calls shouldn’t really be more complex…

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It doesn’t have a GUI editor for tweaking the game contents, like Godot has it, but it’s a complete game engine, so with a tiny bit of configuration, it will do all the things to display your game in a window.

          So, it’s not just a graphics library/module, where you’d still have to write a whole structure yourself, but rather a framework, which means it provides a structure for you and you basically just have to fill out the blanks with whatever you want drawn.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve never done anything with pygame. From the little I’ve just read up on it, it sounds like Bevy is probably a somewhat more cohesive experience (albeit not yet as mature), but yeah, the scope of the projects should be similar.