• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Looks like the barrel is positioned at the bottom of the cylinder. IIRC, an Italian brand was the first to try this and claimed that it did a better job of driving the recoil into the hand and arm instead of over the wrist as with a traditional revolver configuration. Idk how much of it is bro science, but it seems truthy.

    • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Holding a firearm is like holding a lever from a physics pov. It takes less force if you apply it higher up to let the muzzle climb. A low bore axis handgun doesn’t eliminate the force but sends it into the shooter rather than using it to flip the muzzle. Keeping your sights on your target.

      Physicists feel free to correct me if I screwed this up. Think it’d be a class 3.

    • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Did the Mateba not come first?

      E: thanks Firetower. Got to work on my reading comprehension. Additionally, the Chiappa Rhino is a pleasure to shoot and significantly more comfortable compared to a similar high-bore axis pistol. I have a pistol in .38 special that is about the same comfort as another in .44 magnum due to the difference in bore axis.

      • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think Mateba is the Italian company he’s referencing.

        Developed by Mateba, based in Pavia, Italy. Inventor Emilio Ghisoni, who was also famous for later designing the Chiappa Rhino