threelonmusketeers to NASA@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前NASA faces a quandary with its audacious lunar cargo programarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkNASA faces a quandary with its audacious lunar cargo programarstechnica.comthreelonmusketeers to NASA@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarefleabomber@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前What’s with the arstechnica NASA hit pieces lately?
minus-squarethreelonmusketeersOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 年前This article is a hit piece? I thought it had a fairly positive view on the CLPS program.
minus-squarefleabomber@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前I was bothered by the Osiris Rex article. Guess I’m being oversensitive.
minus-squareTar_AlcaranlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前NASA deserves a few hits for how things are running in the moon program. It’s like they forgot every single lesson from Apollo.
minus-squareDoolbs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 年前Oh, great post. Engineer? Or somebody that really knows about this?
minus-squarefleabomber@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前No sorry, just didn’t like their piece about the oSirius Rex mission. I suspect I’m being over sensitive.
What’s with the arstechnica NASA hit pieces lately?
This article is a hit piece? I thought it had a fairly positive view on the CLPS program.
I was bothered by the Osiris Rex article. Guess I’m being oversensitive.
NASA deserves a few hits for how things are running in the moon program. It’s like they forgot every single lesson from Apollo.
Fair enough.
Oh, great post. Engineer? Or somebody that really knows about this?
No sorry, just didn’t like their piece about the oSirius Rex mission. I suspect I’m being over sensitive.