After a short trial, a Texas judge ruled that Barbers Hill school officials are not violating a new state law prohibiting hair discrimination.
A Texas judge on Thursday said the Barbers Hill Independent School District can punish a Black student who wears his hair in long locs without violating Texas’ new CROWN Act, which is meant to prevent hairstyle discrimination in schools and workplaces.
The decision came after a monthslong dispute between the district and Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School who has been sent to in-school suspension since August for wearing his hair in long locs. Legislators last year passed a law called the Texas CROWN Act that prohibits discrimination on the basis of hair texture or protective styles associated with race. Protective styles include locs, braids and twists.
But the Barbers Hill school district successfully argued it can still enforce its policy that prohibits males from wearing hair that extends beyond eyebrows, earlobes or collars even if it’s gathered on top of the student’s head.
Judge Chap B. Cain III issued the ruling after a short trial in which lawyers for opposing sides argued over the legislative intent behind the CROWN Act. Lawyers for Barbers Hill said lawmakers would have included explicit language about hair length had they intended the law to cover it. Allie Booker, representing Darryl George and his mother Darresha George, said protective styles are only possible with long hair.
read more: https://19thnews.org/2024/02/texas-school-district-hair-discrimination-darryl-george/
This is so ridiculous and unnecessary.
Ah, but see, it is cruel. So in the conservative mind it’s okay.
Booker said after the Texas ruling Thursday that she intends to appeal the decision. She also said she will file an injunction in a pending federal lawsuit filed by Darresha and Darryl George against the school district as well as state leaders.
I hope this can get struck down on appeal. I’m glad they are continuing to fight. How racist and farcical. Poor kid.
Yeah, what about religious hairstyles, like Sihks having long hair gathered up on top of the head?
Just… let people have whatever hair they want…
Just… let people have whatever hair they want…
“Absolutely not.”
– Conservatives, probably
I’m a man that has mostly had long hair since I was 14. It’s part of my identity. Their whole ‘collar length’ rule is one I would simply have laughed at them for.
But I’m white (and a man). No one tries to bully me when I set boundaries.Fuck those administrators and their heavy-handed attempt to step on that child’s sense of self. Their school rules do not supersede state law.
And their rules don’t supercede federal law. Some religions forbid cutting of hair (e.g. Sikh), so that would be protected under the first amendment. If one individual is not obligated to cut their hair for religious purposes, surely another individual could choose to not cut their hair under the equal protection clause, even without claiming religious exemption. If not, one party gets special privileges that another does not just because they’re part of a protected class, which is unfair.
That said, I think they can absolutely enforce hair not going beyond your shoulders, since people can tie their hair up. There may be practical reasons for it (e.g. safety, such as in a shop class), or just a uniform standard of appearance. But that’s not what the article is about. If I were the student’s parents, I would seriously consider appealing on constitutional grounds.
Racist, racist is what it is. A conservative excercise in power, in service of reenforcing the racist hierarchy of white people over black people that Conservatives love so much.
Even beyond the obvious issue, boys being forced to have short hair is just sexist as hell.
My understanding is that he would have been allowed to have this style if his hair was long.
Its ridiculous, but they are not forcing men to have shirt hair in this decision.
The district suspended him and put him in ISS (in-school suspension) on the grounds that the code of conduct says that boy hair must be short. The ruling upholds the district punishing the student because his hair is long. This means that the ruling forces students to have short hair when the district mandates it.
The policy:
The…the school district that is restricting hair styles is literally called “Barber Hill”? Like actually?
Fake country lmfaooo
Barbers Hill
I mean??? Of course they have haircut laws.
Why the fuck is the US still policing childrens hair? Just to be racist and enforce heteronormativity?
That’s the only silver lining to this case. It is making national news because this is far from the norm. I know there were plenty of boys when I was growing up who had longer hair. Unlike the idiots running this school, my school administrators had better things to do than go after them for a style choice that had no bearing on academic performance.
Just because you didn’t / don’t experience it doesn’t mean it’s uncommon.
This isn’t actually about the length of his hair.
It’s that Black natural / protective hair styles are seen by racists as being “disrespectful” and they even said why they have the policy.
Their list included many things, but only one of those was actually relevent here “respect for authority”.
Racist people and racist systems will always punish Blackness. This is just one specific example of a larger pattern.
Oh, for sure, these things still happen and far too often when it comes to race, from what I’ve heard about studies on race and disparities in treatment in schools. I’m specifically talking about hair length. I remember there were some Black boys around me in high school with longer hair, but the school drew from an area that was more heavily white, Latino, and Asian so the sample size was minuscule. This is in Portland, OR so of course the culture is going to be different than a conservative part of Texas.
My point is that focusing on length is missing the point.
That’s just the ad-hoc justification for their racist actions.
Most schools have absurd policies in writing that are never actually enforced, until someone decides it has suddenly become a-rule-so-important-we’ll-go-to-court-over-it .
Most of the time, when admin gets suddenly very focused on a rule like this, you’ll find there’s a marginalized student that they want to apply it to. But don’t bring race into this!
Hell, during the 90s is was super fashionable for boys to have very long hair. These people are living in the 19th century.
I’m in a very conservative part of the country and there are a few boys in my neighborhood that have long hair. And that’s with the culture here being against such things.
It’s really a non-issue pretty much everywhere. I guess some admin somewhere was a bit too power hungry.
yes
policy that prohibits males from wearing hair that extends beyond eyebrows, earlobes or collars
fascist shit right here.
“You need significant length to perform the style,” Booker said. “You can’t make braids with a crew cut. You can’t lock anything that isn’t long.”
They said he couldn’t lock his hair because it was too short.
I think that was his own lawyer explaining that the hairstyles protected by the law are all long hair styles, while the rule that the school is punishing him for is one that requires boys to have crew cuts. So the argument is that that rule is in violation of the law.
The times, they are a’changing. What a stupid time to be living. I do find some type of juvenile humor in a haircut being a problem at Barbers Hill.
Someone remind the people in charge of this school that their blood is the same color as everyone else’s, please.
Reconstruction never should have ended
Fuck I read that as “can’t”.
Satanically racist
A Texas judge on Thursday said the Barbers Hill Independent School District can punish a Black student who wears his hair in long locs without violating Texas’ new CROWN Act, which is meant to prevent hairstyle discrimination in schools and workplaces
The mental gymnastics
