The contents of the Israeli Association of Rape Crisis Center’s paper alleging “systematic” Hamas rape derive largely from discredited second-hand testimonies and debunked media reports. Among its most heavily cited sources is a dubious NY Times article that triggered a staff revolt at the paper.
As I’ve said before, Media Bias/Fact Check is a joke.
Removed by mod
I was shown to be incorrect, after which I edited my comment as you can plainly see.
Removed by mod
Obviously I wouldn’t have edited it if someone hadn’t called me out, how would I have known I was wrong if they hadn’t? I intentionally left my original text there, crossed out. If I were trying to hide something then I would have just removed the text altogether.
Wikipedia too, I suppose.
This sub’s credibility seems to be on par with the Gray Zone based on what you’re upvoting - I’m blocking this brain rot.
Why do you have “Stormfront” under the parody Wikipedia globe?
(Literally just asking for clarification. It’s not obvious to me and I’d like to understand your intent.)
It the implication that Wikipedia is as bad as the infamous neo-nazi website Stormfront?
Not sure: I didn’t make the emoji, I only borrowed it. There is a relationship between NATO and fascism, though.
The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It
Grayzone is a Russian propaganda troll pretending to be left wing in order to pull people to their side.
You people are one step away from creating a conservapedia equivalent because “wikipedia has a liberal bias”
Removed by mod
Even outside of political reasons Wikipedia is dog shit, how many more cases of teenagers editing and keeping completely wrong shit should be publicized before you fucking shitlibs stop using it as a source? Or this recent news about a bored housewife trolling the Turks
Removed by mod