• The University of Waterloo is expected to remove smart vending machines from its campus.
  • A student discovered an error code that suggested the machines used facial-recognition technology.
  • Vending Services said the technology didn’t take or store customers’ photos.
  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is there any rational reason why vending machines need to be that complicated?

    Card readers / contactless payment were easy enough to “bolt on” to existing models (they had them when I was in college back in the stone age). So that’s not a sufficient reason.

    There are some “new” features I find useful, such as detecting when an item fails to vend. But those are pretty much just IR “tripwires” that detect the falling product; if it doesn’t trip, then you get refunded or can make another selection.

    I just cannot fathom why vending machines need any of this extra crap.

    Feel free to enlighten me if you’re in the know.

    • girsaysdoom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      It might be advertisements. Some newer gas stations/grocery stores have ads playing on the refrigerated section and when it detects someone on front of the door it will go clear or show a picture of what’s behind the door.

      It’s completely ridiculous but it’s where things are going now.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes. I saw a video about Japanese vending machines and they talked about these cameras being used to help with targeted advertising, either by knowing the person or identifying their demographics and selling to that.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      At this point it costs more money to make a “dumb” vending machine. The cost of a SBC is nothing, and it has more than enough horsepower to process transactions. All that extra horsepower + a 10 cent camera could be used to generate more money with facial recognition so naturally they’re gonna spend the extra 10 cents + cost to drill a hole to do it. It’s practically free to do it.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      MathNews reported that Invenda Group’s FAQ list said that “only the final data, namely presence of a person, estimated age and estimated gender, is collected without any association with an individual.”

      Makes sense why the machine owner would seek this information either for their own use or to sell to others in related fields. Maybe they can use it combined with records of product sales (vs. a very literal form of window-shopping) to identify areas more likely than others to bring consistent returns on the investment of placing, stocking and servicing the machines based on the age/gender statistics of nearby population centers.

      Doesn’t mean I’d want to be part of their dataset or would be comfortable allowing their installation in a facility where that decision was up to me though.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Accounts tied to school ID card? That way you can’t steal someone’s and use theirs, just polls a database and correlates your picture to your id image or something.

      About the only use case I can think of for a school.

      • otacon239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This definitely couldn’t backfire. Can’t think of a single reason in recent memory why someone’s face wouldn’t be visible… 🤔

      • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        At least in the case covered by the article, they don’t appear to be doing that:

        … the director of technology services for Adaria Vending Services[1] told MathNews that “an individual person cannot be identified using the technology in the machines.”

        Still possible if they’re being less-than-perfectly-honest in that statement, they invest more into the technology or with another machine/company somewhere else.

        1

        … the smart vending machines… [are] provided by Adaria Vending Services and manufactured by Invenda Group.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That statement sounds weasely as fuck.

          The technology in that specific machine cannot identify a user, does not mean the machine does no store or transmit the footage to be processed on another machine or system that can.

          • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            “It does not engage in storage, communication, or transmission of any imagery or personally identifiable information,”…

            The linked article includes this statement from Invenda, the manufacturer of the machines. Still have to rely on their truthfulness but they do address that specific point.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh definitely isn’t, just an example of how it can be used. I’ve seen it used in plants to administer safety gear so people don’t use a dozen gloves a week, even though it’s free and provided.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Need? No. It sounds like it did two things: light up when it sensed a person, and also collect age, gender, and other demographic data and send it back to the company.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I can tell you why, as no one here seems to have used these. These are rooms of food items with no workers. Say 10 fridges and other items like apples, bananas, coffee machines microwaves etc sitting out. You walk up, grab what you want, use what you want and then check yourself out. It would be wrong to sell any user data but they did this because they were losing money trying to staff lunch rooms. It costs less to ditch warm/cooler food, and rather balance food loss off these items who know they are being filmed and will likely be expelled from the college for stealing. An example woukd be Gulf Coast State College

      Instead of thinking vending machine, think food court with self checkout. (Saw this both in a FL colllege and also had this at a private company in TN)