• loki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        10 months ago

        Of course, one could argue that a Willy Wonka-inspired event that ended with angry parents and crying children is more authentic to Dahl’s novel than any of the recent Wonka movies.

        this was funny.

        • epyon22@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am sorry for you. Firefox on Android has ublock origin. I feel sorry for you if you are on an iPhone.

          • didnt_readit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why do so many people on Lemmy think iPhones don’t have ad blocking? It’s an OS feature and there’s like a dozen ad blockers available that all work with the stock browser.

            I swear this is like the 5th time I’ve seen a comment like this on Lemmy. I swear no one that complains about iPhones has ever actually used one…

            • epyon22@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yep I’ll be honest never used one. I’ve had ad blocking on my android for probably a decade and it was a struggle for the average android user to have it up till a couple years ago. The walled garden of apple I assumed the ad blocking was just as hard and likely harder than doing it on android.

              • didnt_readit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah iOS has had native support for content blocking since iOS 9 back in 2015. You just install any ad blocker you want from the App Store and you get full desktop style ad blocking in Safari. Also of course you can use DNS based as blocking as well to block ads in apps etc.

                I imagine there is a big conflict of interest from Google with Android ad blocking since they’re essentially an advertising company and run by far the biggest ad network in the world. I’m kind of surprised Android supports it at all to be honest, but good to hear there’s good support now.

                Fuck ads!!

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              Maybe try Firefox instead. I’m on the lemmy sync app and it loads articles natively through it’s own browser, but I guess it doesn’t block ads because the site was complete shit, like you said. However when I opened the article in Firefox not a single ad loaded.

            • WelcomeBear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              No issues for me using NextDNS. I’m a big fan. It blocks everything way upstream at the DNS level so I don’t need to worry about configuring my devices. It’s basically a lazy pihole. I used to run pihole but moved to a new place and couldn’t be bothered to set it up again. No regrets, one less thing to manage.

            • didnt_readit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m using AdGuard on an iPhone and there are zero ads in the article. You should get a better ad blocker I’m sure there are good ones on Android too.

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have you seen the other pictures? They’re hilarious. What a nightmare. People have got to quit paying money for sketchy shit they see on facebook.

      • frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not for $45 though. Maybe if it’d been more like $5 it’d be worth it for the pictures, but definitely not that much.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was clearly an AI generated event, based on the artwork.

      Abysmal looking event.

  • Punkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    That girl has “last minute temp agency assignment” written all over her.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hope people don’t hate on the staff too much, they are as much victims of the event organizer as anyone. Poor bastards, Id have scribbled personal contact detail for all the organisers I knew of, pinned them to a wall, and left.

    • Custard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      She posted something on tiktok about not knowing the event was going to be so bad lol

  • thecrotch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fun fact: there was only 1 woman oompa loompa in the gene wilder version of Willy Wonka, and the actress’s name was Pepe Poupee

    • You999
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      At least it’s vertical unlike most stock photos of a Graham condenser.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Advertised the Willy Wonka Experience, gave the Slurm Experience instead.

    “Tell them I hate them!”