• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    So a judge did an unjust thing and you want me to accept that as something that as okay?

    Are you guys aware of what his happening right now with trump and all these cases and how its targeted prosecution? I am not even going to vote for him, but its pretty obvious what is happening, and I fear how this will end.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        In corrupt countries does the government ever prosecute people for political reasons?

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gosh, as a citizen of the United States I just can’t imagine what goes on in a corrupt country. LOL

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Fraudulent prosecution is a thing, so this particular prosecution is fraudulent. Hmmm, seems like you missed a few steps there.

              Look at the documents case. They bent over backwards to try and get those documents back quietly and let Trump off the hook. If you or I had those documents, we wouldn’t even be given the opportunity to hand them over. We would have SWAT coming through our door, and we would be hauled straight to solitary. A two tiered Justice system exists, but it isn’t what folks like you think.

              That’s the end of my patience for taking you seriously.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Of all of the things, the document case is the only one that works, the problem is that all the various presidents have been guilty of it, and Hillary did much worse and had nothing done to her.

                But you need to look at the combination of all of the cases, and how they have half a billion on two bul1shit cases. The problem is the MAGA people are going to be correct that the election was tampered with if trump loses. I am a trump voter, but I can see the dangers.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  There is a big difference between civil and criminal cases. Anyways, the fact that he was found liable in both cases would tend to indicate they weren’t “bullshit”. In fact, they were both absolutely straightforward cases with solid evidence that Trump did exactly what he was accused of.

                  I really, really don’t give a shit what MAGA morons think about anything. Anyone still MAGA at this point is too far gone for me to care.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Anyways, the fact that he was found liable in both cases would tend to indicate they weren’t “bullshit”

                    Sure they were, I know real estate very well, and that case was nonsense. Also do you know the details of the rape case?

                    You should care what “MAGA morons” think because they have a lot of guns and they have gotten rightfully angrier by the year. Think about how all of us are mad at what they have been doing with the currency and inflation, and then add in the feeling that they are getting cheated at the ballot box too.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    She had a server of secret or top secret (I dont know which) information at her house and in her email. And when the government asked for the data, they destroyed some of the evidence.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If each and every one if these cases was not carefully and fully investigated over a course of several years, you might have an argument.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol. Considering even I watched the events in one case happen live? Yeah. Some things are very easy to investigate.

          What’s that got to do with the conversation? You’re not even any good at the what-a-bout-ism thing, dude. Feel free to overthink it so you can come up with another “zinger”; I don’t care, and won’t be responding anyway…

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            They were both obviously political and not well investigated. The one about Ukraine and Zelensky was obviously silly, but you guys dont realize that because you dont listen to good news sources.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly, you guys want to removed about the orange man, but dont actually want to look at the dangerous things we have going on with the government right now.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You should recognize that your message to people here is simply, hey people obviously dumber than me, did you know you’re all dumber than me?

          You’re assuming people that disagree with you know less or don’t know something that you do.

          That’s not how you engage in effective, constructive discourse. You should first seek to understand, then to be understood.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I dont think they are dumber than me, they are just mislead by the media and dont have the ability to see beyond their own bias. And about this subject I do obviously know more about it than they do.