Seven years ago a video went viral of a prototype Russian robot, the ‘FODOR’, dual weilding Glock pistols. For those of us not paying attention at home this technology is notably absent from the war in Ukraine. This is a subtle nod to the fact that the idea of humanoid robots fighting wars is stupid.

Russia has been developing a humanoid robot for several years now. Its primary purpose is to help astronauts during space missions. Since its appearance in the media, there were discussions of how it can be used for military applications. And just recently a video appeared on the internet released by the Russian deputy prime minister Dmitry Rogozin on his social media pages. In the video, they are testing that robot in a course of several unmanned vehicles tests…

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/04/21/russian-robot-dual-wielding-glock-pistols/

https://youtu.be/HTPIED6jUdU?si=

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think tracks with a variable shape is more practical. Mecha with legs are vulnerable to falling over too easily when they lose a leg, especially with only two. I mean, the best would be a hovertank, but technology isn’t quite there yet.

    Either way, a bipedal mech will lose out on nearly everything except cool factor versus a tank. Especially in cost.

    • lurch (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The problem with tracks is, they are made of exposed complex small parts that can be damaged more easily than anything else on a tank. To make them more sturdy means you have to upscale them, but then the tank becomes heavier and also much slower, because centripetal and centrifugal forces would become insane at speeds tanks drive. The tracks don’t go in a circle after all, but centrifugal force wants to make them.

      A walking tank can still limp with part of a leg missing, but a tracked tank will be stuck the moment one part of the tracks fails.

      And wheeled tanks need lots of space to turn.

      This is why the next steps in tank evolution will be legs or hover, but hover has exposed air intakes and exhausts and needs too much energy for the forseeable future. Legs, however, do not.

      Also legs may give the opportunity to jump. That would be an enormous advantage over current tank propulsion.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        And how are delicate, long legs not a worst and more vulnerable target that tracks?

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      One option is if you can reduce the need for armor by being able to detect and dodge missiles and shells. You’d theoretically be able to react much faster with legs in short bursts.