• HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    We aren’t asking for tax payers money to take care of us in the way you’re thinking. We are asking for universal basic needs. For the young and the old. Healthcare, housing, etc. To move past capitalism. Especially since we are already seeing the issues popping up. People are already starting to work later in life to pay the bills. We are already seeing a surge in elderly homelessness. Of people not being able to pass down anything in inheritance because they have health issues and need to stay in a facility which takes everything from them.

    We aren’t waiting to say “Now that we are older take care of us”

    We are currently saying the system is broken now.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure, but that’s a slightly separate issue than the people who could save, choose not to, and then demand taxpayer money to make up the difference.

      • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Ph yeah, no, I agree with that part. But the part about people waiting till they’re old and then demanding. That part is something we are doing now. We just want people to be taken care of in general. It shouldn’t have to be a worry for anyone of any age.

        But I do agree that those who are lucky enough to be able to save should save. Cause even if shit gets crazy, having something to help you will be better than living in an apartment with nothing. Either way it’s a win.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Who is doing this? This seems like a made up scenario. I don’t know how retirement works in the US but here everyone gets a state pension, as long as they have paid taxes for a certain number of years. It’s not much, imo it should be enough to live on regardless of the mistakes you make in your youth… I think we should all have the freedom to splash out when young and still retire, whatever the reason. I mean while, yes, the money technically comes from present day taxpayers, you paid your taxes in the past to pay for the last generation(s) of retirees… It works out.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          In the US there’s a form of state pension, but it’s not enough to live on. The expectation is that you save for your own retirement.

          • BluesF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think you can just about survive on a state pension here but, yknow, you might not make it many winters because you won’t be able to afford heating.

        • duffman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Made up scenario, are you joking? I can’t even count the number of people I know personally who only care about short term satisfaction over their long term well being. There’s an epidemic of people out there buying cars they can’t afford, going on trips they can’t afford, wracking up credit card debt and living paycheck to paycheck.

          • BluesF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about people not saving and then specifically expecting that the state “make up the difference”.

            My point (which I admit I didn’t make well) is that this is a false scenario because, in my experience anyway, A) you pay for your own state pension through taxes while you are working and B) everyone gets a state pension regardless of their personal pension.

            No one is expecting more from the state specifically for them because they didn’t save enough… Are they? I’m sure that people, like me, believe the state pension should be enough to live on, but for everyone, not just those who squander their savings.

            • duffman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I definitely misunderstood you, my bad. I’m also personally frustrated how my parents lived carelessly and got to live their youth care free(which was never an option for me) and now are putting pressure on me to support them. I’m trying my best to setup my own child for success and trying to figure out if I will ever be done with the painful grind of my 9-6.

        • MayTheBananaBeWithYo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          We do have Social Security that gets paid into, but it’s not a whole lot and if Republicans get their way, they will siphon the money meant for our generation in order to fund frivolous things like walls.