• diykeyboards@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m not sold on this really making a substantial difference in strength, but it seems relatively easy to implement. Hopefully some slicers pick it up as an option and the community can verify.

    • n3m37h
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      More surface area touching, less gaps (air) between layers.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      The video did show summaries towards the end of his findings, he admitted that the improvements with his implementation were not statistically significant but if someone made a better process it could be something.

      What I think the video could have done a better job explaining was the layered brick analogy. I was confused as first because I was picturing the print as the brick wall bottom to top, and I thought, “well all the layers are overlapping each other, so how is this a fair analogy?” But when I realized the the “bricks” were the layers if the print was sideways, I understood what he meant much better, and was a little more convinced that proper implementation could yield significant strength improvements