• mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    My ears.

    No just joking, YouTube music mostly. It’s convenient, available everywhere, has a large catalogue, and good enough quality for me.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      With all respect you’re not the definition of an audiophile at all. If anything you’re kind of the opposite

      • ARNiM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not everyone can discern the difference between a 96KHz FLAC and 256kbps AAC. I can’t. But I still can (barely) tell the difference between 256kbps AAC, and 96kbps AAC.

        But I can tell if a song was well-engineered or a mess.

        I believe those who can’t discern the difference between bitrates (especially on high bitrates), but have the appreciation for good music, good mixing, and good mastering, can still be considered audiophile.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not the comparison at hand, we’re talking YouTube audio compression vs any actual music track.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Especially when your browser or application requests a high quality bitrate, youtube compression is opus 128.

            A person could make the argument that it’s not lossless so it’s not worth listening to, but opus is extremely high quality especially at that bitrate.

            If you wanna try it for yourself, take a flac or whatever, upload it to yt, then use something like yt-dlp -x that defaults to the highest quality to redownload just the audio stream.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                and according to that same link it’s 160, not 128 (format id 251!). someone else pointed that out itt.

                one of my downloads had an average bitrate of ~140 when queried with mediainfo, so i believe em.

                I don’t have the premium account, what’s aac256 comparable to?

                • ARNiM@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  AAC 256 should be at least on par with MP3 320 CBR, might also be on par with ogg vorbis at the same bitrate

        • pezhore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          As I get older and the abuse I put my ears through starts showing up, I completely agree. After upgrading my music library to FLAC from VBR mp3s, I stopped having the, “Oh! There’s a subtle instrument going on in this part of the song!” moments.

          It doesn’t stop me from trying to listen to the highest quality music formats that I can get my hands on, but I 100% know if I think there’s a difference to my mid-40s ears, it’s probably a placebo.

    • scorpious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. As a lifelong musician (live & recording), you’d think I’d be more fussy about audio quality…

      But I’m just not. Just like the 4k vs 2k “debate”… It’s all about CONTENT.

      • Dandroid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also a musician here. I cared a lot when I was younger, but I have so many other more important things to care about now. You only have so my capacity to care about stuff in your life, and the quality of my music doesn’t even come close to mattering these days.

  • pudcollar [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    FLACs from CDs, deemix-gui, qobuz-dl, and Soulseek. 102,000 songs. Play at home with Logitech Media Server. On the road I’ve transcoded it all to 128kbps Opus so i can fit it on a microsd card and I play it with PowerAmp. I mostly use Blessing2 Dusk earbuds with a Shanling MW200 bluetooth neckband, but sometimes also I use Focal Clear OG open-back over-ear cans with a qdelix 5k for bluetooth.

  • Chris@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    „Audiophiles don’t use their equipment to listen to your music. Audiophiles use your music to listen to their equipment.“

    Alan Parsons

    • enix@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I dunno if that’s actually an Alan Parsons quote but up vote for any mention of his name. Does sound like something he’d say.

  • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    FLACs through PlexAmp, either to nice headphones ($500 range) or two channel stereo into some decent speakers with a decent subwoofer. I’d like to upgrade to “full range” speakers one day and save the subwoofer for movies.

    PlexAmp does FLAC when connected to Wi-Fi but I have it set to transcode if I’m using mobile data.

    At home it gets played through Chromecast Audios (R.I.P) which keeps it all digital until it hits my receiver.

  • Big P@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Audiophiles don’t listen to music, they listen to their headphones

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Spotify -> MOTU M2 -> HiFiMan Ananda non-stealth

    “High resolution” audio is completely useless for listening (16 bit 44.1 kHz is the best it gets) and there is little value in lossless encodes for listening purposes too, so I don’t get the point of all those “Hifi” streaming services.
    If you own lossless encodes, I guess it doesn’t hurt to use them even for listening as storage is cheap these days.

    Speaking of which, I’d like to switch to purchasing my music though because Spotify will certainly continue on its path towards full enshittification. I want to be in a position where I own all my favourite music before Spotify will be infected with ads on premium plans. Oh and artists are somewhat more likely to be paid a little for their work that way (I hope…)
    I plan to use the free YT music for discovery at that point.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Completely full of ads already, I routinely get promoted podcasts and gig ticket and merch notifications despite them being turned off.

      • krash@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I started using Spotify lite on my phone. And thankfully, there’s plenty of alternative clients on desktop (such as ncspot). No crap UI elements, just playlists.

  • franpoli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have converted all my CDs to FLAC and I mostly listen to my music collection in stereo speakers instead of headphones because I find the sound more natural. I have built my sound system around the moOde audio software.

  • stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    FLAC’s on NAS. Bluesound Node to stereo system, controlled with Roon. PlexAmp when remote.

    Tidal is actually giving their lossless plan to their lower tier subscription, just got an email about it. Pretty nice.

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Music collection as flac, navidrome as streaming server, symfonium as android app and B&W P5 or B&W Pi7 S2 for headphones.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really wanted to like symfonium (even tho its not open source), bc it is a beautiful client, but it is a battery hog. I had to go back to ultrasonic.

      • dotslashme@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually found all the subsonic clients to be quite heavy on my battery, so I just stuck with the one I liked the best.

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Spotify through Sonos at home and work. Spotify on Google earbuds when out and about.

    I used to really love music discovery on Spotify. I now find it’s the same ald songs over and over. It finds what you like and reinforces that rather than gradually expand it.

    • InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I used to really love music discovery on Spotify. I now find it’s the same ald songs over and over. It finds what you like and reinforces that rather than gradually expand it.

      I’m in the same boat. For years now it’s felt like every daily mix and discovery playlist is 10 songs I recently just listened to on repeat and then 2 songs that aren’t even tangentially related and I’m left questioning why they were being shown to me.

    • krash@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree on the discovery being crap on Spotify. I started to listen to the podcast NPR new music Fridays, and get my discovery that way nowadays.

  • m0yP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    At home: Spotify through Amazon Fire TV through Klipsch The Fives.

    On the move: Spotify through Jabra Elite 4 Active.

    In the bathroom: Spotify through UE Boom.

    I really want to ditch Spotify, but in the meantime…

    • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, TIDAL just got some price cuts, and their library is pretty comparable. Just in case you didn’t know.

    • Oiza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same, but I want to export my playlists and liked songs from Spotify. Going through that manually atm seems like too much of a hassle.

      • hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If you plan to move to another service, there exists a number of tools to aid in moving playlists between streamers. It is really easy, once you find a good one.

        Helped me break the feeling of being locked in due to have 100s of playlists.

        • m0yP@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Tried one service but didn’t work with some Spotify lists, like the yearly ones. Any good recommendation that might include these as well?

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ehhh, I’m ballin on a budget, so take that into account.

    Generally, if I really want to sink into the music, I’m going with either my lgg7 and my beyerdynamic 770 80 ohm; or whatever device can connect with my usb DAC, a fiio q3.

    I do have other options, but that’s my main listening because I simply don’t have the budget to do a proper system with how little I get a chance to listen to music away from headphones. My computer has a decent sound card, and some klipsch speakers that aren’t bad. There’s a home theater unit with cd/bluray hooked up, as well as the shieldTV, and the ability to connect via Bluetooth or cable to whatever device I prefer.

    My car is decent, but not audiophile level. More bass focused than anything else.

    I do have other headphones. Some tin t2s, some sonys, an old set of koss, that kind of thing.

    File wise, its flac and opus.

    I use poweramp and/or usb audio player pro. I prefer poweramp, but the other does bit perfect, which I do like on occasion, and it’s more DAC friendly.

    I’m happy with the options I have, all considered. Most of it was picked up either on sale or used. I would save up while shopping, then get the best I could get when I was ready. But the key to me is that when I want to, I can listen to anything I have and hear the nuance of it. The sound is as clean as I can get it on my budget, and in all reality, my old ears can’t make use of anything fancier.

    You spend almost fifty years living and listening to it loud, you aren’t going to get much bang for your buck out of the really high dollar, precise gear. Hell, I can barely tell a difference between lossless files and mp3 om any given listening method. It’s there, I can still hear a difference, but it’s barely there for me. The better gear helps, but not enough to keep upgrading for tiny changes.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Budget audiophile here: I wear Superlux HD681 semi-open back cans paired with a Creative G6 DAC/amp.

    The headphones are $25 but have the the most realistic soundstage I’ve ever heard in a pair of cans, even better than $500+ ones. Pinna activation is almost perfect; feels more like being surrounded by speakers than wearing headphones. Makes them amazing for gaming and movies, but not the best for music due to harsh siblants in the 12kHz range, which I’ve managed to EQ out a bit using Equalizer APO. Nice neutral sound otherwise, mids are almost perfectly flat and bass is tight—yet full—extending well below 20hz. Honestly you can’t do better without spending half a grand or more.

    • Imgonnatrythis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Best streaming sound available but I had some skipping issues even on very good connections and options for auto Playlist generation and new music discovery was way behind other services. Great if you always knew exaewhat you wanted to hear, but I went to Tidal and their focus on quality is better than most other services but the music discovery algorithms really are quite good, I find myself more eager than ever to tune in to a streaming service.