Since some governments have plans to enforce labels for AI-generated content (text/image/video/audio) on social platforms, should we consider server wide rules for AI generated content (in non-AI communities)?
Or should AI generated content rather be only posted in AI communities?
The thing is, AI Image generation becomes more and more realistic, so I think at some point people can’t be stopped to post it in other communities as well. Also for having efficient filtering on it later, it might be useful to have a clear AI-Label (e.g. [AI] in the title) in place.
Apart from a couple of comms I inherited where the “No AI” clause had been in place (such as [email protected]), or the studios-specific comms, I’ve intentionally left the comms open to the idea of some AI gen content. if the AI content becomes too overwhelming, then that’s a bridge to cross later.
I think tagging such content is a reasonable step, so that there is no potential confusion or doubt for the viewers or mods.
BTW, this is going from a guy who has blocked all the AI-only comms as I don’t actually have much interest in the current AI hype and fad. I simply prefer to see real human beings as unique individuals in all their glory and shortcomings…
I was against AI images before, but reconsidered. I’m into fur fetish, and on Instagram there are two really interesting AI based sources: One is doublekcomics, who AI-enhances their own (old) comics bringing their creations into the photorealistic world, the other one is (I forgot the name) which shows everyday pictures of men in fur - something where you don’t see a lot of content of, outside of the gay fur porn sites. Both are new and interesting.
The main point is probably “are the creators who are using AI as a tool to create interesting works”? Or is AI being used to do the same old stuff over and over again?
However, labelling AI with [AI] is a good idea in any case and it might well be a site-wide rule for me.