They knew what the true cost would be and hid it.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Landlord tax cuts? You’ve got to be shitting me why are they getting tax cuts

    • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      The real estate industry as a whole donated heavily to both National and Act. Not just landlords, but also estate agents etc. They desperately want more activity in the property market even if it means house prices start going up again.

      • liv@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        even if it means house prices start going up again

        They definitely want house prices to start going up again.

        National campaigned on several measures that have a known effect of raising house prices e.g. narrowing the RBNZ mandate, moving the bright line test, reintroducing tax incentives.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m from a completely different continent, but still feel pretty confident in answering “because National is a bunch of corrupt demagogues who are against everything good and in favor of everything bad”.

      How close am I?

  • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Meanwhile, police are threatening to strike over an ‘insulting’ pay offer.

    It’s incredible they get up and talk about how there’s no money for public services, and then immediately defend giving $3 billion to landlords.

    • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      AFIK the police are not allowed to strike. I am sure they can become lazy and slow when they want to though.

      • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ah yes you’re right, earlier articles were saying strike. Now they’re saying industrial action so yeah, work to rule and stuff like that

          • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not sure, that would be a partial strike so don’t know if the prohibition on police striking extends to that or not.

            Work to rule is more like exploiting the mismatch between the requirements of a role on paper, and what it takes to actually do a role in practice. For example, stopping doing things like doing extra unpaid overtime or taking on responsibilities that aren’t technically in your job description but are necessary to keep things going.

  • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m pretty sure they had no idea about the cost. They probably asked their finance minister, who, instead of reading the paperwork tossed a kina at a flock of seagulls and interpreted their reaction as the answer.

  • flambonkscious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m so glad we’ve got some responsible financial stewardship after all this time!

  • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ll continue to have an unreliable, potentially dangerous and end of life interisland ferry service - but at least Landlords will be able to keep their BMWs current.

    • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Its pretty common that folks will cement their opinion after an election. Buyers remorse tends to take a bit longer to kick in.

  • AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Asked how he got the numbers so wrong on interest deductibility, Luxon said, “we didn’t”.

    Does that mean they lied originally, or he’s lying now?