• kingthrillgore@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d go as far as 5 dollars a month, which is more than the buck thirty they make off users right now.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It just boggles the mind.

      They had the userbase. They had the community moderation. They had the power-users basically doing their job for them. They could have had a bulletproof, tied-to-world-population-growth metric - not super fast, but basically monotonically increasing. They basically could have turned it into a sustainable money printer, while not crushing user enthusiasm. Hell, they could have even done an opt- in policy for ML training datasets, either offsetting or outright paying users a commission for content that’s used as part of a training set. There were so many possibilities that didn’t involve pointing the ship at an iceberg.

      Spez threw it away because he wanted the quick payout from ad revenue.

      • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Spez threw it away because he’s a libertarian tool. He doesn’t care how he gets the payout as long as it’s not ‘collectivist’. This commie shit your’e spouting in this post would not impress daddy Elon. GTFO.

    • Kinglink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Active users would, I probably would too. Problem is most apps would struggle to even get new users with that system.