• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    674 months ago

    Bruce Wayne is just another billionaire who likes to get dressed up in leather and beat the underprivileged of gotham. The problem is guns are too quick. He needs to teach these people the lesson that it’s wrong to be poor. And he needs to teach that lesson through pain and permanent physical disfigurement. All whilst bruce’s erection slowly wears its way through his cod piece, beating after beating, suit spunk after suit spunk.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      264 months ago

      Do people genuinely think this about Bruce Wayne or just fucking around? I honestly can’t tell anymore.

      Alan Moore’s brand of nihilist contrarianism has really done a number on the discussion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        94 months ago

        I think people are questioning the ethics of Batman more these days given how discussions around poverty and crime has changed. Given how crime is more often than not a result of poverty and a lack of social safety net than greed or lack of morals, the ethics of Batman bypassing the justice system1 and beating the shit out of henchman comes into question.

        My exposure to this line of thinking was FD Signifier’s video on edge lords, but I haven’t seen other people talk about it until now.

        1. the justice system also fails these people but we’ll ignore that for the sake of argument

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          In early depictions of Batman, there were times in which he freely killed criminals and times where he was an officially deputized state agent. In contrast, most depictions since at least the late 80s and 90s were much more progressive, with Bruce Wayne being the biggest philanthropist in Gotham, helping to provide low cost housing and healthcare, as well as funding criminal rehabilitation and direct job placement for ex-cons with Wayne Industries. Writers were aware of the other aspects of justice that Batman needed to embody long before it was trendy on the internet to edgily portray Batman as a billionaire who enjoys beating people up for fun.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Plenty of people will say that. This is a really good dismantling of the whole concept by thoughtslime, where he basically points out how contradictory and malleable the entire character is, and he can be written as an authoritarian but usually isnt, plus some other stuff I don’t remember: https://youtu.be/73M2sq9zK-I?si=GoJ4paPDgqBskdos

        Also it’s unlisted because it’s in the raft of videos thoughtslime has decided are outdated, bad, or have problematic elements. Idk what it is about this video that got it on the list, but I feel it’s important to mention.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      He also probably holds a large stake in Arkham. Every criminal he sends is money the city puts into his deep pockets

        • deweydecibel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 months ago

          Only in The Batman, that’s not cannon to any other incarnation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Non-cannon doesn’t exist in the DC multiverse.

            Since every iteration is just a different universe. All of them are cannon.

            Yes, even the Batnippels one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    404 months ago

    He doesn’t use guns because he specifically doesn’t like them. If it were just about killing, he’d use nonlethal bullets. The no killing rule is a separate but related phenomenon.

    As for explosives, he generally only uses flash bangs, but when he’s fighting someone who can clearly take it (like Superman or Darkseid) or a robot that it’s okay to kill, then he uses more lethal bombs.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You address it in the first part of your comment but if batman has no problem using lethal bombs than why not a gun? That is where I am at.

      It has to be he specifically doesn’t like guns. Other commentors say he doesn’t like guns because his parents were shot. Which is fine but kinda misses the point imo. It’s like he heard someone say, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Then was like nuh-uh but never moved that logic to, I dont know, incendiary weapons. Anyway, I’m way out in the weeds here.

      The man threw a batarang into the barrel of a gun. Surely he could master non-lethal force with a hand gun or something.

      A batman that uses guns is not as entertaining. I can agree on that much.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        Yeah, he specifically doesn’t like guns, and it’s because his parents were shot. Other weapons are fine. Even a grappling gun is fine. A gun that shoots bullets is not fine because it reminds him of how his parents died.

        • @OneWomanCreamTeam
          link
          24 months ago

          I take it, it’s less of a moral thing and more of a trauma response thing.

  • @its_prolly_fine
    link
    314 months ago

    It’s more of a moral and emotional reason. His parents were killed with a gun. Guns are designed to kill. So he’s not a fan of guns.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    164 months ago

    He has deep seeded trauma about guns that make him think about himself as the same type of murderer that killed his parents, whenever he thinks about using a gun.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    144 months ago

    Well, everyone in modern society knows that only hunters, farmers and shit-scared fuckin cowards own guns so maybe batman is European?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It looks like that because Switzerland has mandatory military service and after that people keep their service rifle at home (without ammunition). But it’s not at all comperable to the gun situation in America.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          184 months ago

          Actually thats the funny and really sad thing. America has guns as they copied the swiss system of an armed militia then kept the guns and abolished the militia creating the basket case they have now with a shitonne of guns and not enough people trained to be safe with them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            Half the white people: Yee haw, I’m gonna shoot some minorities! I’m in a militia!

            Other half of white people: Don’t worry, the police will protect you. No militias gangs allowed!

            • Rhynoplaz
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              Uh oh. Guess I’m getting my white card revoked. I don’t like cowboys or cops.

  • deweydecibel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What incarnation are you talking about where he throws “explosives” out left and right? Not every explosive is lethal. A smoke bomb is technically an explosive.

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    I think guns are too violent for TV. They mostly used ropes and physical combat

    l1000002086