• Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      244
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Forgive them. They aren’t used to choosing their browser yet.

      • akilou
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        97
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re Apple users. They aren’t used to making any decisions when it comes to how their phones work

        • Nurgle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’d defend myself, but I work in digital marketing so I’m not going to dissuade anyone from using AdWords… I mean Android.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Don’t lump us all in with them, Safari with Adblock extensions on mobile, Firefox everywhere else

          • akilou
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            They work the way Apple wants them to

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              They also work how I want them to, well instead of having to fight my own phone, it just works, go figure

              • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Oh give me a break with this nonsense. Android has an 80% global market share, your average dipshit uses it just fine. It also “just works” and very frequently works better than iOS.

                Safari is a shit tier browser when it comes to web standards and performance. It’s hilarious how iOS users try so hard to justify blowing $1000 on a phone when an Android 1/2 of the price does exactly the same thing and is just as easy to use. Why can’t you just enjoy your apple garbage without having this weird superiority complex?

                • kameecoding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Uff, projecting a bit aren’t we? I didn’t start the flame war, the other guy started by shitting on iphone users.

                  And yes, android phones do the 80% of Iphones for less money, but you know what? Those last 20% I do care about.

                  Just something as simple as switching my wireless earbuds between my computer and phone seamlessly, compare the experience between android + windows/linux and the experience with Iphone + macbook with airpods.

                  Small shit like that " just working" makes a huge difference in UX and thats what I care about.

                  Not sure how Safari being garbage is relevant, so is chrome, I use firefox, so, whatever?

                  I have has wireless bluetooth earbuds since like 2018, all of them had the issue that if I put my phone in certain pockets they would cut out, etc.

                  Even my airpods had that issue with my latest OnePlus phone, guess what, never happened once with Iphone, it just works, I don’t have to think about which pocket I should be putting my phone into.

                  The most annoying thing about the Iphone is the keyboard, but I am getting used to it, tried swiftkey, but just as much of a laggy poece of shit as it is on android

              • akilou
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Sounds more like Stockholm Syndrome

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is a proprietary rebranding of Chromium. Can’t say I’d recommend it over (or in addition to) Firefox.

      We need less forks of Chromium. Any one company (Google in this case) having total control over browser engines is dangerous, and is a big reason why the whole Apple/Safari/Webkit situation is such a big deal to begin with.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remember kids, if it’s Chromium based, it’s still part of the problem. The Chromium project only exists to provide the illusion of choice. Don’t let Google have the power to dictate web standards at will.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          The worrisome thing is that there’s no alternative other than Firefox, or Safari on Apple platforms. Every single other browser is Chromium.

          We must defend Firefox at all costs, it’s the last glimmer of freedom.

          • zarenki@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Every single other browser is Chromium.

            One exception I’m aware of: GNOME Web (aka epiphany-browser) uses WebKitGTK, which is based on Apple’s WebKit rather than Google’s Chromium/Blink. But it’s Linux desktops first and foremost. Not on mobile platforms, not exactly intended for Windows (might be usable with Cygwin/WSL) or macOS (seems to be on MacPorts) either, and even on non-GNOME desktops like KDE it might seem a bit out of place.

            I daily drive Firefox but Epiphany is my first choice fallback on the rare occasion I encounter a site that’s broken on Firefox.

      • OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        True but if you use Vivaldi and then you try to go back to Firefox, it’s like going back in the early 2000s. I always say this, Firefox should have been like Vivaldi. Super customizable and packed with features. Instead you have to rely on extensions and thus put your trust in the creator of said extension that they will not sell it. Heck even with extensions, trying to mimic the new tab page from Vivaldi is a masterclass in patience.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is my go to browser. Brave does a better job with blocking ads. I’m switching to Brave whenever I need to stream something on a site loaded with ads, or when YouTube manages to detect my Adblock for a few days.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not like uBlock Origin is a thing?
        Can it really get better than that and consent-o-matic?

        • hOrni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am using uBlock Origin on my Vivaldi. It doesn’t block everything.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          “This Other Browser is just as good as Brave*!”

          *if you install x, y, and z and uninstall a and b

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              You think Firefox is the only browser that can use extensions and add-ons? Brave just doesn’t need them for adblock because it’s built in. But, like all chromium browsers, you can use loads of extensions for loads of use cases. Anything that works on Chrome works on Brave.

              • Resonosity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                It’s maybe a few clicks to find the add-ons store in Firefox then searching “uBlock Origin”. Hell, when I switched to Firefox last year, I want to say there was even an onboarding that pointed me to the extension upon setup.

    • strawberry@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      as someone said, its randomised, and I’m sure that other browsers also saw more downloads

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is extremely slow on IOS and 2gb+ big. Firefox has no extensions so no Adblock. Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Firefox has no extensions so no Adblock.

        That’s because so far every browser on iOS had to use WebKit as it’s HTML rendering engine, meaning that even if you installed another browser manually you were basically still using Safari under the hood. IIRC the new DMA rules include allowing other browser engines like Gecko, so Mozilla is probably already working on making addons available. I mean they are available on Android, so why wouldn’t they make them available on iOS now that they finally can?

        • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I wouldn’t be sure because of how stupid Apples compliance is. But if they do I would definitely switch. I guess it’s just going to be Firefox focus until then.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

        Um, Safari is so privacy friendly that Google regularly asks me if I’m human. For example it has “private relay” which is similar to TOR* so trackers don’t even know your IP address — combine that with blocking third party cookies (and even some first party cookies) by default and providing false data to fight fingerprinting even if you don’t block trackers entirely - and blocking them entirely is as simple as installing an extension. Private Relay also adds a layer of encryption on top of DNS queries and otherwise unencrypted http traffic… so your ISP/Cellular provider/Work/School/abusive husband/etc can’t track you

        99.99% of the Safari’s code is FOSS — dual licensed under LGPL and BSD.

        It’s not the browser I use - pretty lacking in the feature department, but it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

        (* if anything, it’s better than TOR… with that service there’s a risk your entry/exit nodes are tracking you. With Private Relay it’s always one of Apple’s servers for the entry node and a reputable cloud company like Akamai for the exit node. Both would have to be compromised in order to identify you… maybe a nation state can do that, but a big data tracking company definitely can’t)

        • smolyeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean they did say few. Generally speaking, every browser is basically safari (WebKit) on iOS and apple doesn’t allow support for 3rd party browser extensions (least natively, Orion supports this somehow). So you’re already limited in that regard. If you don’t use safari , a browser like FF + VPN is IMO a better experience. You also have the option of just using wireguard and controlling your traffic at home/VPS if you’re into that.

          WebKit might be open source but the browser deployed by apple is not. That’s like saying chrome is open source. They both use open source engines.

        • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Man imagine being so far up apples butt that you actually think Safari is safer than tor

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

          You have this backwards. Google showing you captchas is basically them saying they can’t match your browser to any know (shadow) profile they have already stored. So they aren’t sure you are a human and if so which one specifically. Getting harassed with a captcha is essentially like a badge of honour for your browsers privacy settings.

          • explore_broaden@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            No they don’t, that’s exactly what they said. Safari makes them do CAPTCHAs so it is the most privacy friendly. It is true that it has better blocking features than Firefox on iOS (because Firefox doesn’t have extensions).

            • Muehe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh you are right, I misread that. Thanks for pointing it out.

            • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Firefox is deliberately gimped by Apple on iOS, along with every other browser. It’s not a fair comparison. It’s basically Safari without a ton of extra features that Mozilla was never going to be allowed to implement, which is why the EU decided Apple was being anti-competitive.

              Firefox doesn’t even need extensions to match Safari, but it does need gecko and all the settings it supports on other platforms.

              Apple is a shady company and trusting them with your data is a big mistake.

              • explore_broaden@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t disagree that Firefox is deliberately gimped, and it’s built in blocking features on desktop match Safari on iOS. I’m not sure I really agree that Apple is a “shady company,” in many respects they are doing a good job with end to end encryption and ensuring that they don’t have access to your data in the first place (not to excuse their extreme walled garden approach, which stifles competition and limits good options like Firefox [real Firefox] with uBlock Origin [or uMatrix]).

      • herpaderp@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can get one but not the other. Orion has been pretty solid for me, has all the lovey iOS integration so the happy chemicals Apple spent R&D on does it’s magic while blocking all sorts of things, but it’s closed source :/

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it blocks ads out of the box. I know its new tab screen causes a lot of y’all’s buttholes to clench because it mentions cryptocurrency, but there are harder things to ignore

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Careful, if you try to advocate or defend Brave on Lemmy, you’re stepping on a minefield.

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Idk if I would advocate for or defend it, but I find mobile ads especially abhorrent cuz they take up more relative space on the screen and my upload speed isn’t good enough to be VPNing through my pihole anytime I’m outside the house

          iOS browsers are just skins for Safari anyways, and Brave addresses my issue out of the box, so yeah

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it’s listed as the first item on the browser choice screen for some reason, probably

    • progettarsi@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      8 months ago

      firefox sucks for most people and vivaldi it’s too complicated to configure + it looks like pure bloat

      • max@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why does it suck though? Works fine for me. Granted, I’m a software engineer, but even looking through my “end user glasses”, I don’t see anything wrong with it.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I wouldn’t say Firefox sucks but there are definitely some things that made me use Edge occasionally back when I used Firefox as my main browser. It was mainly stuff like a webpage that doesn’t support Firefox and extensions not having a Firefox version. Which sure aren’t problems with FireFox, it’s more a problem of it not having enough adoption, but to an end user if the thing they wanna use doesn’t work in FireFox but works in Chrome then that’s FireFox’s fault.

          • max@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve used edge before my university disabled profile syncing (only reason I was using it, to be honest). Edge was fine. Switched to Firefox just to see how it is nowadays, never looked back. Honestly, can’t think of any extension I’m missing. Got quite a few myself, but probably not the same niche as you.
            So far I haven’t encountered broken websites yet. Fingers crossed to keep it that way. Though I’ll probably steer clear of such a website unless absolutely necessary.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have very few issues with Firefox. I fine across a site that does not render properly maybe once every other month. I did have some resource issues with it in Windows 10 with it using too much RAM (regularly using 3-4GB) but that has been fixed since I switch to Linux.

        • progettarsi@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          every site i use is slow af in librewolf (basically firefox) and also uses a lot of resources more than chromium based browsers