The law was confusing enough — and troubling enough — that some bars and restaurants decided it was safer to keep hemp-derived beverages off the menu.

At issue was a provision in the state’s recreational marijuana law signed last May that would have prohibited bar servers from selling a patron alcohol and THC beverages in the same five-hour period.

The first confusion was over when bars would start enforcing the “five-hour rule.” Some thought immediately after the bill’s passage, but the myriad effectiveness dates contained in the 300-page bill said it wasn’t to become law until spring 2025. Regardless, the larger issue was this: While a server might know that a patron who they’d served a beer to couldn’t then be served a THC-seltzer, they would have no way of knowing if other patrons had one or the other at another bar.

  • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    they would have no way of knowing if other patrons had one or the other at another bar

    It would probably blow their minds if they found out that people already drink and do drugs at home before they go to any bar. I get that this is probably more about assigning liability than anything else, but it must be embarrassing for legislators to have to pretend that this matters for public safety or whatever.

    • Zeppo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some people, I’ve heard, smoke weed outside of bars before or after drinking and there are even rumors that sometimes people use cocaine right in bar bathrooms. I’m sure legislators have never heard of anything like that, but I swear it’s true.

    • gila@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It was the first thing I thought of having done my responsible service of alcohol certification to work in bars in Australia. Not that it prevents irresponsible service, but you are meant to be checking for specific signs of inebriation in order to selectively deny service to drunk people and adding stoned people into that mix will muddy the waters

  • dumples@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Changing from a 5 hour rule to avoid giving it to inebriated person is so much cleaner and easier to do. How do track 5 hours really?