The mods there have decided to allow underage looking content, skirting close to CP. Unless we want such disgusting stuff on our feed, I think we should defederate from that instance.

Pinging @ernest as well.

  • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is your argument:

    We should ban violent videogames . Everybody know people who play violent videogames are violent. Peolpe claiming “It’S jUsT a GaMe” are protecting violent people

    P.S. I hope you don’t like shaved vaginas, btw, people who like shaved genitals are just ill people people who want to see kid-like genitals without any hair i.e. paedos

        • PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah mate, people liking violent video games does not make them violent. People seeking sexual gratification from underage looking cartoons are definitely paedos, and you’re a fucking moron at best if you can’t see that. Probably just trying to defend your own proclivities though lmao.

          • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            people liking violent video games does not make them violent. People seeking sexual gratification from underage looking cartoons are definitely paedos

            why? where’s the difference?

            violent videogames are fiction
            cartoons are fiction

            Just because you enjoy killing hookers in GTA does not mean you are going to start killing hookers in real life as a hobby
            Just because you like a cartoon does not means you enjoy its real-life equivalent

            it’s the same situation, saying one thing is ok and the other is wrong is being an hypocrite.

            • PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you seriously asking how people getting sexual gratification from underage looking people does not make them paedos? Get the fuck out you absolute shitstain.

              • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you seriously asking how people getting sexual gratification from underage looking people does not make them paedos?

                Gotcha, finally found the issue.
                I can tell the difference between a fictional cartoon character and real people. It looks like you can’t. Apply your own advice and go to see a therapist ASAP.

                • PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Bro, doesn’t matter if they’re real or not, if you get sexual gratification from it, you’re a fucking nonce. That’s why so many countries have laws against it. Fucking hell.

                  • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Then I ask again, tell me what’s the difference between getting gratification from killing people in a videogame and getting gratification by looking at a cartoon (not people)

                    you keep avoiding to reply this question.

                    That’s why so many countries have laws against it

                    Paris had a law that forbade women wearing trousers, should that law be applied country-wise first and then worldwide? That law existed for a reason, I guess

                • Alue42@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What you are attempting to arrive at is The Gamer’s Dilemma, which has also been discussed at a scholarly level.

                  The normalization of underage imagery, as discussed in the aforementioned dilemma, also discussed scholarly extensively, does have a correlation with increased viewing of imagery that does have victims (correlation does NOT mean that every single person end up viewing the additional imagery, just that there is a correlation statistically).

                  You asked me if I would have wanted to ban violent video games before the publication of the studies on them, but the thing is that I wait for information and studies before making decisions on things, and the have been studies on this topic.

                  • Falmarri@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What exactly is that google scholar search meant to prove? I realize it’s been discussed, I just don’t have the links off hand.

                    but the thing is that I wait for information and studies before making decisions on things, and the have been studies on this topic.

                    Yeah there have been studies. They either say “we don’t know”, or they show it can prevent pedophiles from acting on their urges.

                    correlation does NOT mean that every single person end up viewing the additional imagery, just that there is a correlation statistically

                    Is exactly the point. There’s a correlation between people who look at real child porn to people who look at animated child porn. That’s just incredibly obvious, but tells us absolutely nothing about whether it’s helpful or harmful.