I remember back in the day the emulator Snes9x was one of the best emulators for Super Nintendo emulation, but it’s not on the Megathread. Is it no longer trustworthy or was it just missed?

Sorry if this was already asked in this community. I would’ve searched but Lemmy (or at least my Lemmy instance, I suppose) doesn’t seem to have a search function for intra-Community searching.

Cheers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1094 months ago

    there are more accurate emulators nowadays, although because the human race is horrible, we bullied the dev of the most accurate snes emu to suicide

    • GeekFTW
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 months ago

      I had not heard of that, and am not sure I want to…

      • @mister_newbie
        link
        English
        123 months ago

        Near, creator of bsnes/Higan/ares. Their story is tragic.

        • GeekFTW
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          /reads the first few lines of an article.

          yeaaah figuring that out quick :(

            • @mister_newbie
              link
              English
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah, Near was a genius, too. They invented the MSU-1 virtual expansion “chip” for the SNES, which allows for CD audio and video on SNES games (and with an appropriate flashcard, it can interface with and run on actual SNES hardware).

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        English
        274 months ago

        That the emulator behaves exactly as genuine hardware does.

        For one, there are sometimes hardware quirks in consoles that are used to implement features. Like the video screens along the track in Mario Kart 64, the N64 has shared memory between the CPU and GPU, which they used to generate that effect. It’s difficult to replicate that behavior in an emulator.

        Then there’s lag. You might argue that an emulator can provide a better experience by obliterating lag via brute force, but that wouldn’t be the authentic experience the real hardware would provide.

        Or a simple one I’ve noticed with SNES emulators: None of them get the sound quite right. It’s hard to explain, there’s a high pitched “rattle” that isn’t present on a genuine SNES, it’s almost like any emulation is too perfect and isn’t sanding down a rough edge the original hardware did?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      we bullied the dev of the most accurate snes emu to suicide

      To be fair, interacting with people on the internet is almost always a crapshoot for developers.

      It’s why most of them don’t do it.

  • @kugmo
    link
    English
    214 months ago

    It’s lightweight so it doesn’t require the higher specs that bsnes needs (and all of the accuracy improvements you will not notice) and is more compatible with ROM hacks too. IMO it’s still the go-to SNES emu.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    144 months ago

    I believe Retroarch still ships multiple Snes9x cores, and Retroarch is still in the megathread, so you can go for that

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    I still use Zsnes actually.

    The other day I tried to use bsnes and it was stuttering in a CPU capable of running Red Dead Redemption 2. I went to check the task manager and it was using 20% of one of my 4GHz cores, and it still stuttered. I remembered that I used to emulate these games with Zsnes in a 800 MHz Pentium III CPU, so I decided to go back to Zsnes and it worked perfectly, using less than 10% of one 4GHz core.

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Theres some something nice about zsnes’s innacuracy and hacks. Makes me nostalgic for the early days of gaming console emulation. There was a time in my late teenage years in which it was all I was interested in. It was such a cool concept.