• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Its not up to valve to make it easier to access epic. It’s up to epic. I think having an os that is owned by neither valve nor epic would make it more likely to have both storefronts supported as first party citizens.

    Epic isn’t going to come to the table just to make steamOS better. Same as Microsoft isn’t going to make steamOS better.

    But they epic might come to the table and try and get their platform supported if it was an OS not controlled by their direct competition.

    That makes sense in my head but I’m not sure if i have conveyed the idea clearly.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is exactly my point. Microsoft is not supporting linux to improve steamOS or linux gaming. Microsoft supports Linux because they have their own Linux distro that they use and benefit from. The more companies we can get using Linux the better.

        • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          No they support it because of Azure Cloud and DotNet applications. But in some point in time, epic will probably deliver a Linux client and then Valve will probably be forced to make it easier to get the launcher, because they ship steam per default. It’s the same thing the EU is cracking down on with Apple and Microsoft.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            No they support it because of Azure Cloud and DotNet applications.

            That is exactly what I said.

            But in some point in time, epic will probably deliver a Linux client and then Valve will probably be forced to make it easier to get the launcher,

            Epic might* make a linux client if they see a reason to. But is very unlikely valve will be forced to adopt the epic games launcher into their “gaming mode” that is unrealistic. There is 10000x more monopolies to crack down on before anyone takes a look at the tiny handheld linux gaming market.

            Nothing you’ve said provides a reason why Playtron entering the linux gaming market is anything but a positive for linux as a whole. I feel like you think I am attacking valve by talking about their monopoly. I assure you I am not, I like valve and I own a steamdeck. The idea of a gaming app that easily allows users to run games from all platforms equally aligns more with the linux ethos more than the only option being the Steam gaming mode store front and everything else must be added as a non steam game.