Initial disclaimer: I’m very much a progressive person.

Recently listening to podcasts like Heavyweight, Reply All, Invisibilia, Underunderstood etc, I noticed that while the episode - or podcast overall - is investigative journalism lite, something incidental but progressive might happen (using the correct pronouns for a trans person, for example.) I also recently rewatched the Some More News episode on why conservative comedy is so awful, which sparked my pondering.

So… while I’m not interested in veering to the right, this did get me wondering what content might be out there that I’ve not been exposed to at all. Are there (relatively) apolitical podcasts out there that mirror those lite journalism examples above?

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sounds like OP means right-leaning, topic-wise, but not getting into the politics of it. If I had a good example, I’d have replied with it. lol

    As a left-leaning example, NPR is pretty apolitical, but the stories they cover and the words/phrasing they choose to use are designed to appeal to those who lean left. While they’re not a podcast, they do have radio shows.

    I’m not a podcast person, so I can’t really offer any of either bias.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Uh… NPR absolutely gets into the politics of things. Maybe not a deep dive, but 90% of what I hear that isn’t music I’d describe 100% as politics.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sounds like too may only be listening to news shows.

        Fresh Air, This American Life, Car Talk, Something Wild are all largely non-political, but many cover liberal topics, but not from a political standpoint.

        They also tend to cover factual stories about science and the environment, which— unfortunately for the right—tends to involve topics that the right wing have made political.

    • yarr@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      How would one ever discover that a given podcaster is right wing if they are apolitical?

      • otp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Dog whistles? Jokes that punch down?

          • otp
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not explicitly. The whole point of dog whistles is that they’re not supposed to sound political so someone can hide their intentions from people who don’t know and signal their beliefs to the in-group.

            • yarr@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              What’s an example of an apolitical dog whistle that cannot be identified as right or left wing?

              • otp
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                Dog whistles are political, but they don’t sound political. They could be used in apolitical podcasts to signal the host’s political affiliation without explicitly stating it.

                  • otp
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Using “diversity” or “inclusive” as a bad word.

                    Using 88 without reason (or 1488).

                    There’s also people using the term “Monday” to refer to black people. (So they can say “I hate Mondays” and stuff without it being immediately obvious).

                    “Those [kinds of] people” is another pretty transparent one.

                    In Canada, there was “traditional Anglo-Saxon words”, lol