The actually not even really a hatchet job NYT piece on SlateScott that mostly just called him a weird little guy has nonetheless created a festering psychic wound that oozes to this day. Here manifests as an interview with the author on LW. See also: discussion on reddit.

My favorite section, talking about how people are mad that be brought up Scott’s notorious race stuff™️:

CM: That’s great. That’s a valid position. There are other valid positions where people say, we need to not go so close to that, because it’s dangerous and there’s a slippery slope. The irony of this whole situation is that some people who feel that I should not have gone there, who think I should not explore the length and breadth of that situation, are the people who think you should always go there.

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    loved how Metz is literally just explaining his job in terms that make obvious sense, and the commenters go off to construct a stupendous conspiracy theory

    also, like. we have the email where Scott confesses that he started SSC to promote reactionary ideas and race science. Zack has even posted about said email.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        minor point of order (and a little riff): they are talking about their job at the Times, which might be a whole other kettle of fish going by their recent track record

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like “giving everyone their due” is one thing, as long as it’s tempered by the recognition that not every perspective is due equal respect, or that certain perspectives are due a large disclaimer about how factual consensus completely disagrees.