Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095 — far sooner than previous predictions, although not all scientists are convinced.

=====

What if…

  • Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And they know how to fucking fix it but don’t want to

    It’d be like if in the movie Armageddon the government just said “Eh let’s see if it really will be that bad if it hits us”

          • arefx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Without some sort of violent revolution, we won’t, or time runs out but it’s not a movie and there’s no ship to another planet.

              • Saneless@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Revolutions take over where reason stops. The people in power have the means to do the right thing, but sometimes they look out for a few people and will destroy thousands. That’s not a good option, as people get more desperate

                • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Climate change is not something that has a simple solution to it and governments just refuse to do so for whatever reason. That’s a naive view that ignores all the complexity of this issue.

                  For example: stopping all carbon emissions is not going to stop climate change. Not only do you need to become carbon-neutral but you also need to get all the excessive carbon out of the atmosphere. How?

                  • Saneless@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Why the extreme? Cutting back and investing in things that are better should be a mandate, not an idea or option. And certainly we cannot allow an administration to roll things backwards just because someone bribed them donated to their campaign

    • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “We could do something about the asteroid, but think of the harm doing something could do to the shareholders!?”

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was going to save humanity but I have a responsibility to a handful of shareholders that yell at me in meetings so… You can really see how hard this is for me

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s actually kind of too late now.

      But, we may be able to prevent more bad stuff happening if we change things today!

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      IDK, I mean we know it’s to do with carbon but we don’t really know how to stop producing that in a timely manner.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Carbon is causing global warming. We know how to fix global warming because we are causing it, we just have to stop doing it.

      This article is about global cooling which is bizarre and not something we expected would be happening. We haven’t got a clue why it’s doing that. It maybe natural, or it maybe it’s something we’ve done in a complicated way, but we don’t know so we don’t know how to fix it.

      If this is just an ice age why may as well burn all the coal now to try and stave it off.

      Although in reality I think this needs a lot more research before we do anything because this announcement makes no sense within our current understanding of the environmental science.

      • xohshoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Umm, no. Go read it again.

        Global warming shuts off the current, so the warm air doesn’t shuttle north, causing local cooling, not global