Indeed none. That’s literally what the report said. After reviewing 50 hours of video footage and 5000 photos not a single instance of sexual evidence was observed. Patten said she was there to emotionally validate people not collect evidence. Israel has blocked the UN team that has that mandate. Because there is zero evidence and israel knows it.
Jfc some people are dense. What is more likely, that sexual violence occurred as it has in literally every previous attack like this in human history. Or that Hamas acted like puritans while committing terrorism?
Edit: there’s like one good point in your article (“Patten’s report functions as a distraction from genocide”), the rest is BS about not believing victims
I hope you never have to go through the trauma of rape while everyone screams “no evidence! People make this up all the time just to hurt men!” All over the internet. Your article literally says there were witnesses and victims shared their stories.
By the way israels earliest claims were extremely graphic and had high claims of evidence. That women had “nails driven through their vaginas by Hamas” and that there was photographic and video evidence of this.
Patten has supposedly looked at those pictures and decided that a few blurred pixels with an incredibly wild IDF imagination do not constitute evidence for that whatsoever. Just a small indication of all the “evidence” the IDF made up.
Except on oct7 apparently where not a single shred of forensic evidence of any rape happening was found.
There’s often no forensic evidence of rape
There’s never any when the IDF refuses to investigate it.
And also when the IDF says they have forensic and video evidence.
But actually they come out three months later and say no jk we have no evidence.
No evidence?
https://www.vox.com/world-politics/24093631/un-israel-october-7-sexual-violence
It’s like the original posted article says… it always happens
Indeed none. That’s literally what the report said. After reviewing 50 hours of video footage and 5000 photos not a single instance of sexual evidence was observed. Patten said she was there to emotionally validate people not collect evidence. Israel has blocked the UN team that has that mandate. Because there is zero evidence and israel knows it.
Here’s an actual breakdown of the report.
Jfc some people are dense. What is more likely, that sexual violence occurred as it has in literally every previous attack like this in human history. Or that Hamas acted like puritans while committing terrorism?
Edit: there’s like one good point in your article (“Patten’s report functions as a distraction from genocide”), the rest is BS about not believing victims
If there was any evidence israel would be screaming it from the rooftops and blasting it in 4k on some HamasUnleashedDotCom website.
Desperately wanting it to be true doesn’t make it true. In fact israel has turned over every single stone for evidence and found none.
I hope you never have to go through the trauma of rape while everyone screams “no evidence! People make this up all the time just to hurt men!” All over the internet. Your article literally says there were witnesses and victims shared their stories.
If nobody made false rape claims, then we could trust everyone who says rape occurred.
Israel, unfortunately, has a history of lying to make their enemies look bad.
You can thank israel for lying about rape and using it as a tool to justify their Genocide.
Also thank israel for intentionally “not preserving” any evidence of those fictional rapes despite womens rights groups screaming for it
By the way israels earliest claims were extremely graphic and had high claims of evidence. That women had “nails driven through their vaginas by Hamas” and that there was photographic and video evidence of this.
Patten has supposedly looked at those pictures and decided that a few blurred pixels with an incredibly wild IDF imagination do not constitute evidence for that whatsoever. Just a small indication of all the “evidence” the IDF made up.
We’re not talking about speculation.
We’re talking about evidence.
Funny how you shared a link that wasn’t actually evidence, and now you pivot to speculation while calling others “dense”.
Eyewitness evidence is not evidence? Do you know how many convictions don’t involve forensic evidence?