Then, responding to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money", Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit. I make games for a living. If I didn’t want to earn money from them I wouldn’t charge money for them.”

The game follows the premise of being trapped in an underwater submarine out of necessity to capture deep pictures.

  • wellee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s fine, I wasn’t going to buy it anyway :) especially if the creator only did it for the money. I will stick to indie games creators make because they like games <3

    Edit: hahaha apparently I hurt some people’s feelings by having an opinion. Too bad. Indie game isn’t worth $6, and it’s made by someone who doesn’t care about the game, but yeah, go off. I’m going to go play Stardew, something worth money by someone who cares about their game :)

    • Croquette
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Shut up. That indie dev has to eat as well. Indie devs also need to get paid to eat and pay rent. Just like a painter selling their art to make ends meet.

      You’re the kind of person that want arts for free from artists because “it’s only 5$ bro”.

      As the dev said, go pirate it or something.

      • wellee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        7 months ago

        The distinction is he agreed he was only doing it for the money. Idc if they charge for their hard work, they should. But if an indie game is only in it for the money, it’s no better than a gacha.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          He never said he was making the game only for the money; he said that he set the price for the money. Things like a filter that turns everything into Markiplier and continued updates show that he also has passion.

          • wellee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            He literally did, and you even put it in your post.

            “to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money”, Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit."

            When people tell you who they are, listen.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Turns out, it’s not possible to fill your stomach and keep a roof over your head by having enough passion.

      “haha, I hurt your feelings by having an opinion”. No, you’re setting unreasonable expectations in a society that requires money to cover the basics of living. If you’d like to start a revolution to jump directly into a moneyless anarchist collective society, then that’s different. Actually, no, it’s not, because that revolution isn’t happening anytime soon, may not actually work out that way in the end, and even if it does, people shouldn’t have to wait to solve the basics of living.

      • wellee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lmao, no this does not have a larger meaning. An indie dev stated he only cared about the money and started charging $2 more. Shocker.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          stated he only cared about the money

          He did not. He said “I want to earn more money”. That does not preclude being passionate about something, just wanting to have a roof over his head.

          “If you’re passionate about something, you should do it for free” is not a workable position in our society.

          • wellee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can rewrite it as much as you want, but no, he did say that. It’s even in the post.

            “to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money”, Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit."

            I have no idea why everyone is taking this so personally. I said it’s not the game for me, and you all melted LMAO

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              We’re taking it personally because a lot of us are in exactly the same position, or have someone close to us that is. Our passions have to feed us. You’re directly undermining that.

              • wellee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I literally am not, this is not the guys passion. He is in it for the money. He stated that directly.