- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Ubisoft… No thanks
deleted by creator
Sounds a bit like a jab at BG3s length.
I thought they were talking about Valhalla.
That’s exactly what I thought. They’ve been criticized for years about making pointlessly enormous games like Valhalla and Far Cry 6.
Valhalla only sucked because the grind you needed to fight any post mid game bosses would cause any sensible gamer to quit, far cry 6 was lit tho and if they do star wars like far cry 6 it would be good.
I actually finished Far Cry 6 recently, it ain’t that big at all, like 20 hours max. It doesn’t even have too many outposts had has no real towers at all.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Seems like other devs would love the amount of freedom and time to build a massive RPG and praise it instead of taking petty swipes at it.
Good
“You’ll pay more for getting less and you’ll like it!”
I’ll believe it when I see it.
