Edit:

  • article title update, bump not bomb jolt’
  • added comma

DENVER — An engine cover on a Boeing 737 operated by Southwest Airlines ripped open just after taking off from Denver International Airport Sunday morning.

The Houston-bound Southwest flight took off from DIA around 7:45 a.m., and returned to the airport 30 minutes later, landing safely. No injuries were reported.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not how statistics works.

      Just because you win the lottery, that doesn’t mean it was bound to happen. It’s the same with bad luck. Your tile floor in the bathroom is literally more dangerous than an airplane. Do you steel yourself to confront death when you step out of the shower?

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re statistically unlikely to be killed by a shark. Do you want to share a swimming pool with one?

        Statistics aren’t a suit of armor and they can be deeply misleading without context. If every plane in the air crashed today, how would the statistics change? Would 0.00001 become 0.00002? Would you tell people there was nothing to fear because it’s still statistically unlikely?

        I would guess that every single passenger jet that has ever crashed had at least one person who reassured themselves “it won’t happen to me”.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re statistically unlikely to be killed by a shark. Do you want to share a swimming pool with one?

          If more than a million Americans safely swam in that pool yesterday, I would feel comfortable swimming there today.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Depends on the kind of shark. Most sharks ignore people. You can pet reef sharks. People pay thousands of dollars to swim with them. That’s the context.

          The context here is that planes are almost excessively safe. The door was sucked off of one and no one even died. Can you tell me the last time a fatal accident happened to a commercial airplane in the US?

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            So you’re when it comes to my shark analogy you demand nuance down to the specific type of shark but for planes you’re happy with “It was safe last year so it must still be safe now”?

            Is this some bizarre shill campaign or is everyone trying to be crowned “King of science and rationalism”?

            The door was sucked off of one and no one even died.

            And do you know what the FAA said about it? “This incident should have never happened and it cannot happen again”. But don’t worry about the whistleblowers saying management has been covering up defects and cutting corners, “the statistics” say it’s safe.

            I could load you on to a burning plane with a drunk and the answer to “Can you tell me the last time a fatal accident happened to a commercial airplane in the US?” wouldn’t change until you hit the ground.

            But don’t worry, because “statistics”.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Everyday there are thousands of Boeing flights that go off without a hitch. It’s still statically completely unlikely that anything bad will happen to you on a Boeing flight. So much so that it’s probably not even worth worrying about at all.

              But this isn’t to say that we should just let their bs slide. This is exactly why flying is so safe: we are sticklers for making sure they do everything right. If that’s going in the opposite direction, we should nip it in the bud long before it gets anywhere close to the point where you should question the safety of it.

              But, again, we aren’t even remotely close to that now. It makes no logical sense to be afraid of flying right now, even on a Boeing jet. And I would like to keep it that way which is why I think their issues need to be addressed.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If you swim in a swimming pool with a shark, you are not statistically unlikely to be killed by one.

          This is a really terrible analogy, for a really terrible way of thinking about risk.

          Assuming you have a point here, then based on the logic you seem to be trying to to use, you should also never drive a car, go outside, eat a sandwich, etc. You know, since there was a point when people doing those things died, and those people thought they’d be ok too.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        … So they got on a plane knowing they were definitely going to die? They didn’t get on a plane with the very same remote chance of dying in a plane crash as every one else has, only to then die in a plane crash?

        I guess they should have checked the Lemmy statistics before they boarded, where “it’s unlikely to happen to me” can be extrapolated to “it will never happen to anyone”.

        Fuck, why does Boeing even bother pretending to do all that maintenance? Apparently planes don’t burst into flames because they’re protected by magical statistics. Just throw a screwdriver in the engine, it doesn’t make any difference.